Re: [PATCH 00/10] arm64/entry:

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Tue, Apr 07 2026 at 14:16, Mark Rutland wrote:
> I've split the series into a prefix of changes for generic irqentry,
> followed by changes to the arm64 code. I'm hoping that we can queue the
> generic irqentry patches onto a stable branch, or take those via arm64.
> The patches are as follows:
>
> * Patches 1 and 2 are cleanup to the generic irqentry code. These have no
>   functional impact, and I think these can be taken regardless of the
>   rest of the series.
>
> * Patches 3 to 5 refactor the generic irqentry code as described above,
>   providing separate irqentry_{enter,exit}() functions and providing a
>   split form of irqentry_exit_to_kernel_mode() similar to what exists
>   for irqentry_exit_to_user_mode(). These patches alone should have no
>   functional impact.

I looked through them and I can't find any problem with them. I queued
them localy and added the missing kernel doc as I promised you on IRC.

As I have quite a conflict pending in the tip tree with other changes
related to the generic entry code, I suggest that I queue 1-5, tag them
for arm64 consumption and merge them into the conflicting branch to
avoid trouble with pull request ordering and headaches for the -next
people.

Does that work for you?

Thanks,

        tglx