Re: [PATCH] perf build: Fix detection of latest openjdk

From: Namhyung Kim

Date: Wed Apr 08 2026 - 01:47:38 EST


On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 09:19:57AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 01:03:20AM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > My fedora system fails to find openjdk even if I installed the
> > 'java-latest-openjdk-devel' package as in the warning message.
> > It turns out that the directory path is different than what's in the
> > output of alternatives.
> >
> > Makefile.config:1122: No openjdk development package found, please install JDK package,
> > e.g. openjdk-8-jdk, java-latest-openjdk-devel
> >
> > The Makefile.config has the rule like below to detect the installed
> > directory with a version number.
> >
> > $ alternatives --display java | tail -1 | cut -d ' ' -f 5 | sed -e 's%/jre/bin/java.%%g' -e 's%/bin/java.%%g'
> > /usr/lib/jvm/java-21-openjdk
> >
> > This is to find a directory where the header file (jvmti.h) is like
> > /usr/lib/jvm/java-21-openjdk/include/jvmti.h. However the header file
> > was in a different directory.
> >
> > $ rpm -ql java-latest-openjdk-devel | grep jvmti.h
> > /usr/lib/jvm/java-latest-openjdk/include/jvmti.h
> >
> > It seems the directory name is fixed to provide the latest version.
> > Let's check the directory name before using the parsed name. With this
> > change, the warning is gone on my system.
>
> Interesting, I'm not noticing this on Fedora rawhide (44), I created a
> fresh toolbox container with fedora:rawhide and had, as you, this:
>
> ⬢ [acme@toolbx perf-tools-next]$ m
> make: Entering directory '/home/acme/git/linux/tools/perf'
> BUILD: Doing 'make -j32' parallel build
> Warning: Kernel ABI header differences:
> diff -u tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h
> Makefile.config:1070: No libbabeltrace found, disables 'perf data' CTF format support, please install libbabeltrace-dev[el]/libbabeltrace-ctf-dev
> Makefile.config:1122: No openjdk development package found, please install JDK package, e.g. openjdk-8-jdk, java-latest-openjdk-devel
>
>
> Then I just followed the suggestion and did a:
>
> $ sudo dnf install java-latest-openjdk-devel
>
> And after that the 1122 warning vanished and:
>
> ⬢ [acme@toolbx perf-tools-next]$ ls -la /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/feature/test-jvmti*
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 acme acme 12384 Apr 7 09:14 /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/feature/test-jvmti.bin
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 acme acme 12392 Apr 7 09:14 /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/feature/test-jvmti-cmlr.bin
> -rw-r--r--. 1 acme acme 1188 Apr 7 09:14 /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/feature/test-jvmti-cmlr.d
> -rw-r--r--. 1 acme acme 0 Apr 7 09:14 /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/feature/test-jvmti-cmlr.make.output
> -rw-r--r--. 1 acme acme 1122 Apr 7 09:14 /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/feature/test-jvmti.d
> -rw-r--r--. 1 acme acme 0 Apr 7 09:14 /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/feature/test-jvmti.make.output
> ⬢ [acme@toolbx perf-tools-next]$ cat /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/feature/test-jvmti.make.output
> ⬢ [acme@toolbx perf-tools-next]$
>
> ⬢ [acme@toolbx perf-tools-next]$ alternatives --display java | tail -1 | cut -d ' ' -f 5 | sed -e 's%/jre/bin/java.%%g' -e 's%/bin/java.%%g'
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-latest-openjdk
> ⬢ [acme@toolbx perf-tools-next]$
>
> ⬢ [acme@toolbx perf-tools-next]$ alternatives --display java
> java - status is auto.
> link currently points to /usr/lib/jvm/java-latest-openjdk/bin/java
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-latest-openjdk/bin/java - priority 1
> follower jre: /usr/lib/jvm/java-latest-openjdk
> follower alt-java: /usr/lib/jvm/java-latest-openjdk/bin/alt-java
> follower jcmd: /usr/lib/jvm/java-latest-openjdk/bin/jcmd
> follower keytool: /usr/lib/jvm/java-latest-openjdk/bin/keytool
> follower rmiregistry: /usr/lib/jvm/java-latest-openjdk/bin/rmiregistry
> follower java.1.gz: /usr/lib/jvm/java-latest-openjdk/man/man1/java.1
> follower alt-java.1.gz: /usr/lib/jvm/java-latest-openjdk/man/man1/alt-java.1
> follower jcmd.1.gz: /usr/lib/jvm/java-latest-openjdk/man/man1/jcmd.1
> follower keytool.1.gz: /usr/lib/jvm/java-latest-openjdk/man/man1/keytool.1
> follower rmiregistry.1.gz: /usr/lib/jvm/java-latest-openjdk/man/man1/rmiregistry.1
> Current `best' version is /usr/lib/jvm/java-latest-openjdk/bin/java.
> ⬢ [acme@toolbx perf-tools-next]$

Thanks for checking this. Looks like a local issue on my system.
I've updated the alternatives to point to the latest version.

Thanks,
Namhyung