Re: [PATCH v10 12/21] gpu: nova-core: mm: Add unified page table entry wrapper enums

[Joel Fernandes]

On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 08:01:01PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed Apr 8, 2026 at 6:58 PM CEST, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> So you're making the code much much worse than before actually. We don't
>> new traits and types pointlessly.
>
> I had a look at both approaches and yes, the traits can be considered
> boilerplate. But, they are not complex and they just list method signatures that
> each version's types already implement functionality wise and they get us rid of
> a lot of dispatch sites. The implementation turns out cleaner as there is less
> parameter threading throughout call chains, etc. Overall, it seems more
> scalable.
>
> On the other hand, there are indeed more abstractions and type indirections to
> understand in Eliot's code. I.e. there are advantages and disadvantages to both
> approaches.
>
> That said, please engage with Eliot's proposal, it is not as off as your reply
> implies and dismissing it right away is not what I'd like to see in this
> situation.

No one is “dismissing it right away”. If you read all the threads, you will see
that I already came up with the same approach and have spent time coding
it up myself to learn its potential advantages and drawbacks. :-) I would never
dismiss anyone’s suggestion just for the sake of it, without evaluating. Hence
most of my morning went in collecting data with both approaches (more on that in
another upcoming reply).

Also yes of course we have to look at all the pros and cons and carefully make a
choice collectively, there are tradeoffs in both approaches.

thanks,

--
Joel Fernandes