Re: [PATCH] mm/memory hotplug/unplug: Optimize zone contiguous check when changing pfn range
From: Sion Ji
Date: Wed Apr 08 2026 - 22:36:07 EST
On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 05:56:22AM -0400, Yuan Liu wrote:
> When invoke move_pfn_range_to_zone or remove_pfn_range_from_zone, it will
> update the zone->contiguous by checking the new zone's pfn range from the
> beginning to the end, regardless the previous state of the old zone. When
> the zone's pfn range is large, the cost of traversing the pfn range to
> update the zone->contiguous could be significant.
>
> Add a new zone's pages_with_memmap member, it is pages within the zone that
> have an online memmap. It includes present pages and memory holes that have
> a memmap. When spanned_pages == pages_with_online_memmap, pfn_to_page() can
> be performed without further checks on any pfn within the zone span.
>
> The following test cases of memory hotplug for a VM [1], tested in the
> environment [2], show that this optimization can significantly reduce the
> memory hotplug time [3].
>
> +----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
> | | Size | Time (before) | Time (after) | Time Reduction |
> | +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
> | Plug Memory | 256G | 10s | 3s | 70% |
> | +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
> | | 512G | 36s | 7s | 81% |
> +----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
>
> +----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
> | | Size | Time (before) | Time (after) | Time Reduction |
> | +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
> | Unplug Memory | 256G | 11s | 4s | 64% |
> | +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
> | | 512G | 36s | 9s | 75% |
> +----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
>
> [1] Qemu commands to hotplug 256G/512G memory for a VM:
> object_add memory-backend-ram,id=hotmem0,size=256G/512G,share=on
> device_add virtio-mem-pci,id=vmem1,memdev=hotmem0,bus=port1
> qom-set vmem1 requested-size 256G/512G (Plug Memory)
> qom-set vmem1 requested-size 0G (Unplug Memory)
>
> [2] Hardware : Intel Icelake server
> Guest Kernel : v7.0-rc4
> Qemu : v9.0.0
>
> Launch VM :
> qemu-system-x86_64 -accel kvm -cpu host \
> -drive file=./Centos10_cloud.qcow2,format=qcow2,if=virtio \
> -drive file=./seed.img,format=raw,if=virtio \
> -smp 3,cores=3,threads=1,sockets=1,maxcpus=3 \
> -m 2G,slots=10,maxmem=2052472M \
> -device pcie-root-port,id=port1,bus=pcie.0,slot=1,multifunction=on \
> -device pcie-root-port,id=port2,bus=pcie.0,slot=2 \
> -nographic -machine q35 \
> -nic user,hostfwd=tcp::3000-:22
>
> Guest kernel auto-onlines newly added memory blocks:
> echo online > /sys/devices/system/memory/auto_online_blocks
>
> [3] The time from typing the QEMU commands in [1] to when the output of
> 'grep MemTotal /proc/meminfo' on Guest reflects that all hotplugged
> memory is recognized.
Since the above results were tested in a QEMU environment, we ran the
tests in a real-world environment [1]. The kernel version is v7.0-rc4,
which is the same as the QEMU guest kernel. We configured remote memory
node using 2 and 4 CXL devices for the 256G and 512G tests, respectively.
We replaced the QEMU hotplug commands with the daxctl [2]. We tested by
changing the value of /sys/devices/system/memory/auto_online_blocks.
The following is the result when the kernel onlines added memory blocks:
(echo online > /sys/devices/system/memory/auto_online_blocks)
+----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
| | Size | Time (before) | Time (after) | Time Reduction |
| +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
| Plug Memory | 256G | 6.7s | 4.4s | -35% |
| +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
| | 512G | 18s | 8.7s | -52% |
+----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
+----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
| | Size | Time (before) | Time (after) | Time Reduction |
| +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
| Unplug Memory | 256G | 2.8s | 2.6s | -8% |
| +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
| | 512G | 5.2s | 5s | -4% |
+----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
[1] Platform : Intel GNR-AP
CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6960P
Memory : Samsung DDR5-4800
Hotplug devices : Samsung CXL 2.0 128G Devices
Kernel : v7.0-rc4
[2] daxctl commands to hotplug memory for a test:
time daxctl reconfigure-device --force --mode=system-ram dax0.0
(Plug Memory)
time daxctl reconfigure-device --force --mode=devdax dax0.0
(Unplug Memory)
The following is the result when the value is set to online_movable:
(echo online_movable > /sys/devices/system/memory/auto_online_blocks)
+----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
| | Size | Time (before) | Time (after) | Time Reduction |
| +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
| Plug Memory | 256G | 4.5s | 4.4s | -3% |
| +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
| | 512G | 18.6s | 6.6s | -65% |
+----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
+----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
| | Size | Time (before) | Time (after) | Time Reduction |
| +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
| Unplug Memory | 256G | 2.2s | 2.6s | +18% |
| +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
| | 512G | 5.2s | 4.2s | -20% |
+----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
FYI, it is the result when kernel does not automatically online memory.
(echo offline > /sys/devices/system/memory/auto_online_blocks)
+----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
| | Size | Time (before) | Time (after) | Time Reduction |
| +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
| Plug Memory | 256G | 3.3s | 4.4s | +33% |
| +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
| | 512G | 6.7s | 6.6s | -2% |
+----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
+----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
| | Size | Time (before) | Time (after) | Time Reduction |
| +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
| Unplug Memory | 256G | 2.2s | 2.6s | +18% |
| +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
| | 512G | 4.4s | 4.2s | -5% |
+----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
We hope this result is helpful.
Regards,
Sion Ji