Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: nvmem: Add a binding for the RPi Firmware OTP register

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 10:00:15AM +0200, Gregor Herburger wrote:
> The firmware running on the Raspberry Pi VideoCore can be used to access
> OTP registers. There are two OTP regions (private and customer). Add a
> binding for these.

A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "a binding for the". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17-rc3/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18

> 
> Signed-off-by: Gregor Herburger <gregor.herburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../bindings/arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware.yaml
> index 983ea80eaec9..975c8927d75b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware.yaml
> @@ -137,6 +137,20 @@ required:
>    - compatible
>    - mboxes
>  
> +patternProperties:
> +  "^otp-(customer|private)$":

Not a pattern but just "otp".

> +    type: object
> +    additionalProperties: false
> +
> +    properties:
> +      compatible:
> +        enum:
> +          - raspberrypi,firmware-otp-customer
> +          - raspberrypi,firmware-otp-private

I don't understand why having OTP regions is not deducible from
top-level compatible. I also do not get why do you need per OTP
compatible.

There are no resources here, so standard review would be "no" and you
need strong justification in terms of DT.

Best regards,
Krzysztof