Re: (subset) [PATCH v6 00/11] Add support for the TI BQ25792 battery charger

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 19:43:37 +0400, Alexey Charkov wrote:
> Add support for the TI BQ25792 battery charger
> 
> This adds support for the TI BQ25792 battery charger, which is similar in
> overall logic to the BQ25703A, but has a different register layout and
> slightly different lower-level programming logic.
> 
> The series is organized as follows:
> - Patch 1 adds the new variant to the existing DT binding, including the
>   changes in electrical characteristics
> - Patches 2-4 are minor cleanups to the existing BQ25703A OTG regulator
>   driver, slimming down the code and making it more reusable for the new
>   BQ25792 variant
> - Patch 5 is a logical fix to the BQ25703A clamping logic for VSYSMIN
>   (this is a standalone fix which can be applied independently and may be
>   backported to stable)
> - Patches 6-8 are slight refactoring of the existing BQ25703A charger
>   driver to make it more reusable for the new BQ25792 variant
> - Patch 9 adds platform data to distinguish between the two variants in
>   the parent MFD driver, and binds it to the new compatible string
> - Patches 10-11 add variant-specific code to support the new BQ25792
>   variant in the regulator part and the charger part respectively,
>   selected by the platform data added in patch 9
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-7.1

Thanks!

[02/11] regulator: bq257xx: Remove reference to the parent MFD's dev
        https://git.kernel.org/broonie/regulator/c/aef4d87f2c1f
[04/11] regulator: bq257xx: Make OTG enable GPIO really optional
        https://git.kernel.org/broonie/regulator/c/de76a763805d

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark