Re: [PATCH] mailbox: mailbox-test: free channels on probe error

From: Jassi Brar

Date: Sun Apr 12 2026 - 21:42:22 EST


On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 7:56 AM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On probe error, free the previously obtained channels. This not only
> prevents a leak, but also UAF scenarios because the client structure
> will be removed nonetheless because it was allocated with devm.
>
> Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260327151217.5327-2-wsa%2Brenesas%40sang-engineering.com
> Fixes: 8ea4484d0c2b ("mailbox: Add generic mechanism for testing Mailbox Controllers")
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> This fixes an issue spotted by Sashiko while reviewing a previous patch.
> I confirmed the UAF by hacking some error injection to the drivers.
>
> drivers/mailbox/mailbox-test.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-test.c b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-test.c
> index 058c0fe4b9c2..e7cae11780c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-test.c
> @@ -409,18 +409,27 @@ static int mbox_test_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (tdev->rx_channel) {
> tdev->rx_buffer = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> MBOX_MAX_MSG_LEN, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!tdev->rx_buffer)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!tdev->rx_buffer) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_unreg_chan;
> + }
> }
>
> ret = mbox_test_add_debugfs(pdev, tdev);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto err_unreg_chan;
>
> init_waitqueue_head(&tdev->waitq);
> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Successfully registered\n");
>
> return 0;
> +
> + err_unreg_chan:
> + if (tdev->tx_channel)
> + mbox_free_channel(tdev->tx_channel);
> + if (tdev->rx_channel)
> + mbox_free_channel(tdev->rx_channel);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void mbox_test_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> --
> 2.51.0
>
With trivial cosmetic changes s/err_unreg_chan/err_free_chans/
Applied to mailbox/for-next
Thanks
Jassi