Re: [PATCH v10 22/29] perf s390-sample-raw: Don't pass evsel or its PMU with sample

[Namhyung Kim]

On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 09:59:56AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 9:41 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2026 at 07:08:25PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > The sample contains the evsel and its PMU so it is unnecessary to pass
> > > the evsel as well.
> >
> > This patch is changed to minimize the diff.
> 
> I'm not sure what this means as the patch already attempted to
> minimize the diff. I'm worried that not sending changes to my patches
> via the list introduces errors because they don't go through Sashiko.

Please take a look at the tmp.perf-tools-next branch.  I kept the local
evsel variable.

Thanks,
Namhyung