Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/491] 5.10.253-rc1 review
From: Ben Copeland
Date: Wed Apr 15 2026 - 01:49:29 EST
On Tue, 14 Apr 2026 at 09:03, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon 2026-04-13 19:52:08, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On 13/04/2026 16:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.253 release.
> > > There are 491 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:57:08 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.253-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> > >
> > > -------------
> > > Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
> >
> > ...
> > > Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > bus: omap-ocp2scp: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
> >
> >
> > I am seeing the following build error due to the above change on ARM platforms ...
> >
> > drivers/bus/omap-ocp2scp.c:95:10: error: 'struct platform_driver' has no member named 'remove_new'; did you mean 'remove'?
> > 95 | .remove_new = omap_ocp2scp_remove,
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~
> > | remove
> > drivers/bus/omap-ocp2scp.c:95:27: error: initialization of 'int (*)(struct platform_device *)' from incompatible pointer type 'void (*)(struct platform_device *)' [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> > 95 | .remove_new = omap_ocp2scp_remove,
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
>
> We see that one, too:
>
> https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/jobs/13901155305
> https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/pipelines/2450043152
>
> Best regards,
This was also observed on KernelCI:
https://dashboard.kernelci.org/tree/stable-rc/linux-5.10.y/0abb5988a311f0e617615aa4b08c90b3ade85c25?df%7Ca%7Carm=true
The two issues:
https://dashboard.kernelci.org/issue/maestro%3A67d434ff5d6b71886d45efe758ca00ff45cb969a?iv=1
https://dashboard.kernelci.org/issue/maestro%3Ac970827f049cfd67124148e3c19abe1d4aa8347a?iv=1
Regards
Ben
> Pavel