Re: [PATCH v2 20/31] x86/virt/tdx: Add a helper to loop on TDX_INTERRUPTED_RESUMABLE
From: Xu Yilun
Date: Wed Apr 22 2026 - 02:30:56 EST
On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 07:21:48AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2026 12:01 AM
> >
> > +static u64 __maybe_unused __seamcall_ir_resched(sc_func_t sc_func, u64
> > fn,
> > + struct tdx_module_args *args)
> > +{
>
> 'ir' sounds redundant with the trailing 'resched'?
Mm.. I want to 'ir' to reflect the loop-retry is dedicated for
INTERRUPTED_RESUMABLE in TDX context. When you say not big deal, I
assume I can keep the naming?
>
> not big deal, just a bit confusing when seeing it in IOMMU side where
> 'ir' also refers to 'interrupt remapping' and is frequently used in
> irq_remapping.c... :)