Re: [RFC] [QUESTION] Stuff to do for string

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 23/04/2026 08:46, Josh Law wrote:
> On 23 April 2026 07:44:11 BST, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 23/04/2026 08:29, Josh Law wrote:
>>> On 23 April 2026 07:24:50 BST, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>> On 22/04/2026 16:57, Josh Law wrote:
>>>>> Hello, (this is my first RFC, so maybe cc is bad, but yeah)
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you guys have planned/would like me to have a look at doing in
>>>>> lib/string.c
>>>>
>>>> Do nothing. As some people already said: go away.
>>>>
>>>> You were lying multiple times, including how you tested the patches and
>>>> that you claim you have device being worked on:
>>>> "I own this device"
>>>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/f8772114-a495-409b-a590-a9b1d8ed1d41@xxxxxxxxx/
>>>>
>>>> Even after proving you fabricated absolute AI slop you claimed
>> otherwise:
>>>> "The commit descriptions (The long ones), Use AI, to be exact! "
>>>>
>>>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/043CED5F-7014-4776-824E-07E027B7BDC3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>>>>
>>>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/04B79050-4353-4FD2-A596-1474BDB94B3F@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>>>>
>>>> So no, we do not want you to look at anything. You were told that
>>>> multiple times.
>>>>
>>>> Just because one maintainer gives you chance, it still means - don't
>>>> touch /lib or any other part of core kernel.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>
>>>
>>> Krzysztof, haven't you been told to _NOT_ interfere/nack my
>>
>> You're joking or what?
> 
> Wait, you haven't been told? To not nack my patches if there are
> other maintainers??? I'm confused.

Stop inventing stories. One more thing you keep lying about. I will be
NAKing your patches when you keep sending such arrogant emails "I am
representing lib" [1] or you keep pushing untested code to backports [2].

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/16B7B5A8-EEA7-4580-A565-3A0B4DBB08AB@xxxxxxxxx/

[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/C9577A36-B531-4480-BEA5-42F660C184CA@xxxxxxxxx/

Best regards,
Krzysztof