Re: [REGRESSION] rseq: refactoring in v6.19 broke everyone on arm64 and tcmalloc everywhere

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

On 2026-04-23 01:53, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
[...]
> +linux-man
>
> This part of the rseq man page needs to be fixed as well I think. The
> kernel no longer reliably provides clearing of rseq_cs on preemption,
> right?
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/librseq/librseq.git/tree/doc/man/rseq.2#n241

I'm maintaining this manual page in librseq.

> "and set to NULL by the kernel when it restarts an assembly
> instruction sequence block,
> as well as when the kernel detects that it is preempting or delivering
> a signal outside of the range targeted by the rseq_cs."

I think you got two things confused here.

1) There is currently a bug on arm64 where it fails to honor the
   rseq ABI contract wrt critical section abort. AFAIU there is a
   fix proposed for this.

2) Thomas relaxed the implementation of cpu_id_start field updates
   so it only stores to the rseq area when the current cpu actually
   changes (migration).

So AFAIU the statement in the man page is still fine. It's just arm64
that needs fixing.

Thanks,

Mathieu

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com