Re: [PATCH v2] mm/memory: update stale locking comments for fault handlers
From: Aditya Sharma
Date: Thu Apr 23 2026 - 11:06:44 EST
Hi David,
Understood. Will send v3 as a new thread, not a reply.
I'll apply the wording changes ("held" and "see FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK") and send out the v3 shortly
Thanks,
Aditya
From: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Aditya Sharma"<adi.sharma@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ljs@xxxxxxxxxx>, <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>, <vbabka@xxxxxxxxxx>, <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>, <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>, <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 19:57:21 +0530
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/memory: update stale locking comments for fault handlers
> On 4/5/26 19:18, Aditya Sharma wrote:
> > Update the comments for wp_page_copy(), do_wp_page(), do_swap_page(),
> > do_anonymous_page(), __do_fault(), do_fault(), handle_pte_fault(),
> > __handle_mm_fault(), and handle_mm_fault() to concisely clarify that
> > they can be entered holding either the mmap_lock or the VMA lock,
> > and that the lock may be released upon returning VM_FAULT_RETRY.
> >
> > Additionally, make the following corrections:
> > - In do_anonymous_page(), correct the outdated claim that the function
> > is entered with the PTE "mapped but not yet locked". Since
> > handle_pte_fault() unmaps the empty PTE before routing to
> > do_pte_missing(), the comment now correctly states it is entered
> > with the PTE unmapped and unlocked.
> > - In __do_fault(), update the stale reference from __lock_page_retry()
> > to __folio_lock_or_retry().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aditya Sharma <adi.sharma@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Next time, please don't send as reply to your previous version
>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Simplified the comment to concisely state "either the VMA lock or
> > the mmap_lock" instead of a verbose explanation (per David Hildenbrand).
> > - Expanded the scope to cover 8 other fault handlers in mm/memory.c
> > that suffered from the same stale mmap_lock comments.
> > - Fixed an additional historical inaccuracy in do_anonymous_page()
> > regarding the PTE mapping state on entry.
> > - Updated a stale reference in __do_fault() from __lock_page_retry()
> > to __folio_lock_or_retry().
> >
> >
> > mm/memory.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> > index c65e82c86..2b407e3f9 100644
> > --- a/mm/memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/memory.c
> > @@ -3742,8 +3742,8 @@ vm_fault_t __vmf_anon_prepare(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > * Handle the case of a page which we actually need to copy to a new page,
> > * either due to COW or unsharing.
> > *
> > - * Called with mmap_lock locked and the old page referenced, but
> > - * without the ptl held.
> > + * Called with either the VMA lock or the mmap_lock (FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK
> > + * tells you which)
>
> "Called with either the VMA lock or the mmap_lock *held*"
>
> Same for other cases.
>
> Can we shorten "FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK tells you which" to "see FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK"
>
> ?
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David
>