Re: [syzbot] [mm?] WARNING: bad unlock balance in do_wp_page
From: Qi Zheng
Date: Mon Apr 27 2026 - 07:01:45 EST
On 4/27/26 6:44 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 17:43:38 +0800 Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Alright, it seems I have successfully reproduced it:
(The reproducer is attached at the bottom of this email.)
That's a lot of code. Thanks for doing that. Maybe there's something
here we can put into selftests/
If we are inclined to drop rebinding, then perhaps it's unnecessary to
add selftest for it. ;)
However, in a production environment, this is practically impossible.
Can you expand on this?
sysbot isn't a production environment ;)
Rebinding only works when the hierarchy is completely empty. This is
generally not the case in a production environment (e.g. when systemd
is used).
BTW, it seems rebinding is about to be deprecated:
cgroup1_reconfigure
--> pr_warn("option changes via remount are deprecated (pid=%d comm=%s)\n",
task_tgid_nr(current), current->comm);
Also, it appears the current memcg subsystem assumes that
cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) cannot be changed at runtime.
(Please correct me if I missed anything.)
If we can get a reproducer, we can try the following fix, or simply drop
rebinding altogether?
We'll want something which is applicable to 7.1-rcX please. Removal of
rebinding sounds like something we'd address in 7.2 or later.
Got it.
From 6ae41b91339625dd7bf0f819f775f26e78171a73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 11:20:21 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: fix rcu unbalance in
get_non_dying_memcg_end()
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
With the above patch applied, the warnings are gone.
If no one objects, I'll submit the formal fix. Or should we actually
just remove rebinding instead?
I suggest we just fix up current -rc please.
OK, will do.
Thanks,
Qi