Re: [PATCH] rhashtable: give each instance its own lockdep class

[Herbert Xu]

On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 04:31:49AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Is this related to https://lore.kernel.org/202604211323.fac1b29e-lkp@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> Are we able to identify a Fixes: target?
> 
> In the above-linked thread Herbert had
> Fixes: c6307674ed82 ("mm: kvmalloc: add non-blocking support for vmalloc")

I think they're two separate issues.  The addition of non-blocking
support triggered the vfree while atomic issue, while the lockdep
splat is simply due to the use of rhashtable in fs/core.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt