Re: [PATCH 2/2] eventpoll: Fix epoll_wait() report false negative

[Nam Cao]

Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> The selftests rely on this behavior that timeout=0 sees events from a
> concurrently running producer. They would fail at a very higher rate
> after this change - believe me I had a similar patch that changed
> something in this area.

Huh, that's interesting. Do you still remember which selftest cases rely
on this behavior? I would like to study them further.

> I would explore the seqcount that Mateusz suggested tbh.

I will investigate that.

Nam