Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] mm: process_mrelease: skip LRU movement for exclusive file folios

[Michal Hocko]

On Wed 29-04-26 11:09:55, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Unrelated stupid question: would things be clearer if we could rename
> MMF_UNSTABLE to MMF_OOM_REAPING once figure out whether aborting fork() still
> really needs it?

While the oom is the only current kernel user of MMF_UNSTABLE (in a
sense it sets the flag) the flag should denote that any page faults are
reliable because it might fault in a fresh memory and user would lose
the previous content without knowing that. Not sure MMF_OOM_REAPING
would reflect that reality better.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs