Re: [PATCH v2 05/15] serial: core: replace snprintf with more robust scnprintf

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 01:53:51PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> 
> Use scnprintf() so we could perhaps one day get rid of snprintf() entirely.

Ah, now I understand the approach in earlycon. Hmm... Still not sure which one
I prefer (it's not related to the contents of this patch anyway).

...

>  	default:
>  		strscpy(address, "*unknown*", sizeof(address));

Side note: This may use 2-argument strscpy().

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko