Re: [PATCH 17/28] KVM: nVMX: pass PFERR_USER_MASK to MMU on EPT violations
From: Sean Christopherson
Date: Thu Apr 30 2026 - 15:03:31 EST
On Thu, Apr 30, 2026, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> For EPT, PFERR_USER_MASK refers not to the CPL of the guest,
> but to the AND of the U bits encountered while walking guest
> page tables; this is consistent with how MBEC differentiates
> between XS and XU. This is available through the
> "advanced vmexit information for EPT violations" feature.
>
> Tested-by: David Riley <d.riley@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h | 6 +++++-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h
> index 40fa72f31fc7..48520fa1c8e8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h
> @@ -100,9 +100,13 @@ static inline int __vmx_handle_ept_violation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
> error_code |= (exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_PROT_USER_EXEC)
> ? PFERR_PRESENT_MASK : 0;
>
> - if (exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_GVA_IS_VALID)
> + if (exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_GVA_IS_VALID) {
> error_code |= (exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_GVA_TRANSLATED) ?
> PFERR_GUEST_FINAL_MASK : PFERR_GUEST_PAGE_MASK;
> + if ((exit_qualification & (EPT_VIOLATION_GVA_TRANSLATED|EPT_VIOLATION_GVA_USER))
> + == (EPT_VIOLATION_GVA_TRANSLATED|EPT_VIOLATION_GVA_USER))
Ow. Maybe add a helper or a local const u64? Actually, no need, just drop the
ternary operator above:
if (exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_GVA_IS_VALID) {
if (exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_GVA_TRANSLATED) {
error_code |= PFERR_GUEST_FINAL_MASK;
if (exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_GVA_USER)
error_code |= PFERR_USER_MASK;
} else {
error_code |= PFERR_GUEST_PAGE_MASK;
}
}