Re: [PATCH v4] hfsplus: fix null-ptr-deref by creating hidden dir on remount rw

From: Viacheslav Dubeyko

Date: Thu Apr 30 2026 - 15:47:11 EST


On Thu, 2026-04-30 at 07:33 +0530, Deepanshu Kartikey wrote:
> hfsplus_reconfigure() does not create the hidden directory when
> remounting from read-only to read-write, leaving sbi->hidden_dir
> as NULL. This causes a null-ptr-deref when any subsequent
> link/unlink/rename operation dereferences it.
>
> Extract hidden directory creation into a helper and call it from
> hfsplus_reconfigure() when switching to read-write mode.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+c0ba772a362e70937dfb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c0ba772a362e70937dfb
> Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Correct fix: extract hidden dir creation into helper and call
> from hfsplus_reconfigure() on remount rw, as suggested by
> Vyacheslav Dubeyko.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Correct fix location: guard sbi->hidden_dir in hfsplus_link()
> and hfsplus_unlink() in dir.c.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Fixed commit message: hfsplus_delete_cat() has multiple callers,
> not just hfsplus_unlink() as incorrectly stated in v1.
> ---
> fs/hfsplus/super.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/super.c b/fs/hfsplus/super.c
> index 7229a8ae89f9..8b5c39ce4d48 100644
> --- a/fs/hfsplus/super.c
> +++ b/fs/hfsplus/super.c
> @@ -372,15 +372,59 @@ static int hfsplus_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int hfsplus_create_hidden_dir(struct super_block *sb)
> +{
> + struct hfsplus_sb_info *sbi = HFSPLUS_SB(sb);
> + struct inode *root = d_inode(sb->s_root);
> + struct qstr str;
> + int err;
> +
> + str.len = sizeof(HFSP_HIDDENDIR_NAME) - 1;
> + str.name = HFSP_HIDDENDIR_NAME;

The hfsplus_fill_super() has this initialization. It looks like duplication.
Maybe, we need to add this into hfsplus_reconfigure() and get str as input
argument?

> +
> + mutex_lock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> + sbi->hidden_dir = hfsplus_new_inode(sb, root, S_IFDIR);
> + if (!sbi->hidden_dir) {
> + mutex_unlock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + err = hfsplus_create_cat(sbi->hidden_dir->i_ino, root,
> + &str, sbi->hidden_dir);
> + if (err) {
> + mutex_unlock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> + goto out_put_hidden_dir;
> + }
> +
> + err = hfsplus_init_security(sbi->hidden_dir, root, &str);
> + if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> + err = 0;
> + else if (err) {
> + hfsplus_delete_cat(sbi->hidden_dir->i_ino, root, &str);
> + mutex_unlock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> + goto out_put_hidden_dir;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> + hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(sbi->hidden_dir,
> + HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY);
> + return 0;
> +
> +out_put_hidden_dir:
> + iput(sbi->hidden_dir);
> + sbi->hidden_dir = NULL;
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int hfsplus_reconfigure(struct fs_context *fc)
> {
> struct super_block *sb = fc->root->d_sb;
> + struct hfsplus_sb_info *sbi = HFSPLUS_SB(sb);
>
> sync_filesystem(sb);
> if ((bool)(fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(sb))
> return 0;
> if (!(fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY)) {
> - struct hfsplus_sb_info *sbi = HFSPLUS_SB(sb);
> struct hfsplus_vh *vhdr = sbi->s_vhdr;
>
> if (!(vhdr->attributes & cpu_to_be32(HFSPLUS_VOL_UNMNT))) {
> @@ -401,6 +445,12 @@ static int hfsplus_reconfigure(struct fs_context *fc)
> fc->sb_flags |= SB_RDONLY;
> }
> }
> + /*
> + * Create hidden dir if remounting read-write and it does
> + * not exist - required for link/unlink/rename operations.
> + */
> + if (!sb_rdonly(sb) && !sbi->hidden_dir)
> + return hfsplus_create_hidden_dir(sb);

It looks like hfsplus_reconfigure() is always false on a successful remount. The
sb->s_flags is updated by the VFS after reconfigure returns 0, not inside it.
The correct guard is !(fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY), which reflects the negotiated
new state.

> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -595,38 +645,9 @@ static int hfsplus_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
> hfsplus_sync_fs(sb, 1);
>
> if (!sbi->hidden_dir) {
> - mutex_lock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> - sbi->hidden_dir = hfsplus_new_inode(sb, root, S_IFDIR);
> - if (!sbi->hidden_dir) {
> - mutex_unlock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> - err = -ENOMEM;
> + err = hfsplus_create_hidden_dir(sb);
> + if (err)
> goto out_put_root;
> - }
> - err = hfsplus_create_cat(sbi->hidden_dir->i_ino, root,
> - &str, sbi->hidden_dir);
> - if (err) {
> - mutex_unlock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> - goto out_put_hidden_dir;
> - }
> -
> - err = hfsplus_init_security(sbi->hidden_dir,
> - root, &str);
> - if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> - err = 0; /* Operation is not supported. */
> - else if (err) {
> - /*
> - * Try to delete anyway without
> - * error analysis.
> - */

What was wrong with the comment? Why have we lost it?

> - hfsplus_delete_cat(sbi->hidden_dir->i_ino,
> - root, &str);
> - mutex_unlock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> - goto out_put_hidden_dir;
> - }
> -
> - mutex_unlock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> - hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(sbi->hidden_dir,
> - HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY);

Are you sure that you work with the latest sources? Because, current state of
this code is:

hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(HFSPLUS_CAT_TREE_I(sb), HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY);
hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(sbi->hidden_dir, HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY);

> }
> }
>
> @@ -634,9 +655,6 @@ static int hfsplus_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
> sbi->nls = nls;
> return 0;
>
> -out_put_hidden_dir:
> - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&sbi->sync_work);

Why cancel_delayed_work_sync() has been removed? The hfsplus_new_inode() calls
hfsplus_mark_mdb_dirty() which queues sync_work. So, nothing cancels the queued
work in the case of any issue.

Thanks,
Slava.

> - iput(sbi->hidden_dir);
> out_put_root:
> dput(sb->s_root);
> sb->s_root = NULL;