Re: [PATCH v4] hfsplus: fix null-ptr-deref by creating hidden dir on remount rw

From: Deepanshu Kartikey

Date: Sat May 02 2026 - 10:50:15 EST


On Fri, May 1, 2026 at 1:16 AM Viacheslav Dubeyko <vdubeyko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2026-04-30 at 07:33 +0530, Deepanshu Kartikey wrote:
> > hfsplus_reconfigure() does not create the hidden directory when
> > remounting from read-only to read-write, leaving sbi->hidden_dir
> > as NULL. This causes a null-ptr-deref when any subsequent
> > link/unlink/rename operation dereferences it.
> >
> > Extract hidden directory creation into a helper and call it from
> > hfsplus_reconfigure() when switching to read-write mode.
> >
> > Reported-by: syzbot+c0ba772a362e70937dfb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c0ba772a362e70937dfb
> > Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Correct fix: extract hidden dir creation into helper and call
> > from hfsplus_reconfigure() on remount rw, as suggested by
> > Vyacheslav Dubeyko.
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Correct fix location: guard sbi->hidden_dir in hfsplus_link()
> > and hfsplus_unlink() in dir.c.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Fixed commit message: hfsplus_delete_cat() has multiple callers,
> > not just hfsplus_unlink() as incorrectly stated in v1.
> > ---
> > fs/hfsplus/super.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/super.c b/fs/hfsplus/super.c
> > index 7229a8ae89f9..8b5c39ce4d48 100644
> > --- a/fs/hfsplus/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/hfsplus/super.c
> > @@ -372,15 +372,59 @@ static int hfsplus_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int hfsplus_create_hidden_dir(struct super_block *sb)
> > +{
> > + struct hfsplus_sb_info *sbi = HFSPLUS_SB(sb);
> > + struct inode *root = d_inode(sb->s_root);
> > + struct qstr str;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + str.len = sizeof(HFSP_HIDDENDIR_NAME) - 1;
> > + str.name = HFSP_HIDDENDIR_NAME;
>
> The hfsplus_fill_super() has this initialization. It looks like duplication.
> Maybe, we need to add this into hfsplus_reconfigure() and get str as input
> argument?
>
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> > + sbi->hidden_dir = hfsplus_new_inode(sb, root, S_IFDIR);
> > + if (!sbi->hidden_dir) {
> > + mutex_unlock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + err = hfsplus_create_cat(sbi->hidden_dir->i_ino, root,
> > + &str, sbi->hidden_dir);
> > + if (err) {
> > + mutex_unlock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> > + goto out_put_hidden_dir;
> > + }
> > +
> > + err = hfsplus_init_security(sbi->hidden_dir, root, &str);
> > + if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> > + err = 0;
> > + else if (err) {
> > + hfsplus_delete_cat(sbi->hidden_dir->i_ino, root, &str);
> > + mutex_unlock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> > + goto out_put_hidden_dir;
> > + }
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> > + hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(sbi->hidden_dir,
> > + HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY);
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +out_put_hidden_dir:
> > + iput(sbi->hidden_dir);
> > + sbi->hidden_dir = NULL;
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int hfsplus_reconfigure(struct fs_context *fc)
> > {
> > struct super_block *sb = fc->root->d_sb;
> > + struct hfsplus_sb_info *sbi = HFSPLUS_SB(sb);
> >
> > sync_filesystem(sb);
> > if ((bool)(fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(sb))
> > return 0;
> > if (!(fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY)) {
> > - struct hfsplus_sb_info *sbi = HFSPLUS_SB(sb);
> > struct hfsplus_vh *vhdr = sbi->s_vhdr;
> >
> > if (!(vhdr->attributes & cpu_to_be32(HFSPLUS_VOL_UNMNT))) {
> > @@ -401,6 +445,12 @@ static int hfsplus_reconfigure(struct fs_context *fc)
> > fc->sb_flags |= SB_RDONLY;
> > }
> > }
> > + /*
> > + * Create hidden dir if remounting read-write and it does
> > + * not exist - required for link/unlink/rename operations.
> > + */
> > + if (!sb_rdonly(sb) && !sbi->hidden_dir)
> > + return hfsplus_create_hidden_dir(sb);
>
> It looks like hfsplus_reconfigure() is always false on a successful remount. The
> sb->s_flags is updated by the VFS after reconfigure returns 0, not inside it.
> The correct guard is !(fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY), which reflects the negotiated
> new state.
>
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -595,38 +645,9 @@ static int hfsplus_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
> > hfsplus_sync_fs(sb, 1);
> >
> > if (!sbi->hidden_dir) {
> > - mutex_lock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> > - sbi->hidden_dir = hfsplus_new_inode(sb, root, S_IFDIR);
> > - if (!sbi->hidden_dir) {
> > - mutex_unlock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> > - err = -ENOMEM;
> > + err = hfsplus_create_hidden_dir(sb);
> > + if (err)
> > goto out_put_root;
> > - }
> > - err = hfsplus_create_cat(sbi->hidden_dir->i_ino, root,
> > - &str, sbi->hidden_dir);
> > - if (err) {
> > - mutex_unlock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> > - goto out_put_hidden_dir;
> > - }
> > -
> > - err = hfsplus_init_security(sbi->hidden_dir,
> > - root, &str);
> > - if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> > - err = 0; /* Operation is not supported. */
> > - else if (err) {
> > - /*
> > - * Try to delete anyway without
> > - * error analysis.
> > - */
>
> What was wrong with the comment? Why have we lost it?
>
> > - hfsplus_delete_cat(sbi->hidden_dir->i_ino,
> > - root, &str);
> > - mutex_unlock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> > - goto out_put_hidden_dir;
> > - }
> > -
> > - mutex_unlock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
> > - hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(sbi->hidden_dir,
> > - HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY);
>
> Are you sure that you work with the latest sources? Because, current state of
> this code is:
>
> hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(HFSPLUS_CAT_TREE_I(sb), HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY);
> hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(sbi->hidden_dir, HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY);
>
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -634,9 +655,6 @@ static int hfsplus_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
> > sbi->nls = nls;
> > return 0;
> >
> > -out_put_hidden_dir:
> > - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&sbi->sync_work);
>
> Why cancel_delayed_work_sync() has been removed? The hfsplus_new_inode() calls
> hfsplus_mark_mdb_dirty() which queues sync_work. So, nothing cancels the queued
> work in the case of any issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Slava.
>
> > - iput(sbi->hidden_dir);
> > out_put_root:
> > dput(sb->s_root);
> > sb->s_root = NULL;
>

I will send the patch v5 shortly

Thanks