Re: [PATCH] nvmem: layouts: Add fixed-layout driver

[Mathieu Dubois-Briand]

On Tue May 5, 2026 at 11:14 AM CEST, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,

Hi Miquel,

>
> On 05/05/2026 at 10:42:10 +02, Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Current implementation isn't working well when device tree nodes have a
>> phandle on a fixed-layout nvmem node. As the fixed layout is handled in
>> nvmem core, no driver is ever associated with the layout, and the device
>> consumer driver probe is deferred indefinitely.
>>
>> Remove the specific handling of fixed-layout and add a layout driver.
>> This makes the fixed-layout similar to all other layouts, fixing the
>> whole issue.
>
> I guess this deserves a Fixes tag as well as a stable backport.
>

That's right. I will add:
Fixes: fc29fd821d9a (nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become regular devices)

Arguably, we could reference a commit even before, but I believe this is
the commit that introduced a different behaviour between fixed-layout
and other layouts.

>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS                          |  5 ++++
>>  drivers/nvmem/core.c                 | 23 +---------------
>>  drivers/nvmem/layouts.c              | 11 --------
>>  drivers/nvmem/layouts/Makefile       |  1 +
>>  drivers/nvmem/layouts/fixed-layout.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/linux/nvmem-provider.h       |  7 +++++
>>  6 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/layouts/Makefile b/drivers/nvmem/layouts/Makefile
>> index 4940c9db0665..fbc195aa382c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvmem/layouts/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/layouts/Makefile
>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>>  # Makefile for nvmem layouts.
>>  #
>>  
>> +obj-y += fixed-layout.o
>
> This implies that you cannot remove that driver. I'm fine with it, but
> maybe since this is now almost costless, we could have a Kconfig entry
> that defaults to =y? This is not a blocker, I have no strong
> opinion. Srinivas?
>

Right. My first idea was fixed-layout is still a bit special, and should
always be present, just as before. But thinking again about it, there is
no real reason to make it different.

I will wait for Srinivas opinion, but I'm open to make it optional.
Should this be a separate commit, so it can be excluded from a potential
backport?

>>  obj-$(CONFIG_NVMEM_LAYOUT_SL28_VPD) += sl28vpd.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_NVMEM_LAYOUT_ONIE_TLV) += onie-tlv.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_NVMEM_LAYOUT_U_BOOT_ENV) += u-boot-env.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/layouts/fixed-layout.c b/drivers/nvmem/layouts/fixed-layout.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..e5078d72a6fc
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/layouts/fixed-layout.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright 2025 Bootlin
>
> Can probably be bumped :-)
>

Thanks :)

>> + *
>> + * Authors: Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/nvmem-provider.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl

Thanks for your review,
Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com