Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqchip/gic-v5: Add IWB to ACPI probe dependency control

Next message: Matthew Brost: "[PATCH v5 1/2] drm/ttm: Drop tt-&gt;restore after successful restore"
Previous message: Arnd Bergmann: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: pxa2xx: push gpio usage into arch code"
In reply to: Lorenzo Pieralisi: "[PATCH 2/2] irqchip/gic-v5: Add IWB to ACPI probe dependency control"
Next in thread: Lorenzo Pieralisi: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqchip/gic-v5: Add IWB to ACPI probe dependency control"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Thomas Gleixner

Date: Tue May 05 2026 - 16:04:47 EST

On Tue, May 05 2026 at 10:48, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Arm GICv5 systems, wired IRQs routed to an IWB may require resolving

S/IRQs/interrupts/g

Changelogs are prose and not an acronym dump ground.

> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-iwb.c | 5 +++++
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> include/linux/acpi_iort.h | 3 ++-

I'm confused about the conglomerate of files affected by an irqchip
change...

Thanks,

tglx