Re: [PATCH] mm: fix __vm_normal_page() to handle missing support for pmd_special()/pud_special()
From: Baolin Wang
Date: Wed May 06 2026 - 01:11:58 EST
On 4/30/26 7:31 PM, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
On x86 32-bit with THP enabled, zap_huge_pmd() is seen to generate a
"WARNING: mm/memory.c:735 at __vm_normal_page+0x6a/0x7d", from the
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(is_zero_pfn(pfn) || is_huge_zero_pfn(pfn)); followed
by "BUG: Bad rss-counter state"s, then later "BUG: Bad page state"s
when reclaim gets to call shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan().
It's as if the _PAGE_SPECIAL bit never got set in the huge_zero pmd:
and indeed, whereas pte_special() and pte_mkspecial() are subject to a
dedicated CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL, pmd_special() and pmd_mkspecial()
are subject to CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_PMD_PFNMAP, which is never enabled
on any 32-bit architecture.
While the problem was exposed through commit d80a9cb1a64a ("mm/huge_memory:
add and use normal_or_softleaf_folio_pmd()"), it was an oversight in commit
af38538801c6 ("mm/memory: factor out common code from vm_normal_page_*()")
and would result in other problems:
* huge zero folio accounted in smaps, pagemap (PAGE_IS_FILE) and
numamaps as file-backed THP
* folio_walk_start() returning the folio even without FW_ZEROPAGE set.
Callers seem to tolerate that, though.
... and triggering the VM_WARN_ON_ONE(), although never reported so far.
To fix it, teach vm_normal_page_pmd()/vm_normal_page_pud() to consider
whether pmd_special/pud_special is actually implemented.
Fixes: af38538801c6 ("mm/memory: factor out common code from vm_normal_page_*()")
Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/74a75b59-2e13-3985-ee99-d5521f39df2a@xxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260430041121.2839350-1-maobibo@xxxxxxxxxxx
Debugged-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
LGTM. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>