Re: [PATCH v5 07/18] iio: magnetometer: ak8975: modernize polling loops with iopoll() macros
From: Joshua Crofts
Date: Wed May 06 2026 - 03:01:33 EST
On Wed, 6 May 2026 at 08:53, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 01:46:03PM +0200, Joshua Crofts via B4 Relay wrote:
>
> > The driver currently uses while loops and msleep() for polling during
> > conversion waits.
> >
> > Replace the custom polling loops with readx_poll_timeout() and
> > read_poll_timeout() macros from <linux/iopoll.h>. This reduces
> > boilerplate, standardizes timeout handling and improves overall code
> > readability, keeping the original timing and error behaviour. Add
> > <linux/time.h> for USEC_PER_MSEC macro instead of using magic numbers.
>
> ...
>
> > + ret = read_poll_timeout(i2c_smbus_read_byte_data, val, val != 0,
> > + poll_ms * USEC_PER_MSEC,
> > + timeout_ms * USEC_PER_MSEC,
> > + true,
> > + client, data->def->ctrl_regs[ST1]);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + if (val < 0) {
> > + dev_err(&client->dev, "Error in reading ST1\n");
> > + return val;
> > }
> > - if (!timeout_ms)
> > - return -ETIMEDOUT;
> >
> > - return read_status;
> > + return val;
>
> Besides the unneeded return val duplication, I think this is the wrong location
> for this check and it changes behaviour (really subtle change!).
>
> Before if the last iteration gives an error from the device, we return
> -ETIMEDOUT instead of the whatever the i2c_smbus_read_byte_data() returns.
Yeah, that is pretty subtle, but I agree.
--
Kind regards
CJD