Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] mm, swap: add support for stable large allocation in swap cache directly

From: Chris Li

Date: Wed May 06 2026 - 16:28:07 EST


On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 8:16 AM Kairui Song via B4 Relay
<devnull+kasong.tencent.com@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> To make it possible to allocate large folios directly in swap cache,
> provide a new infrastructure helper to handle the swap cache status
> check, allocation, and order fallback in the swap cache layer
>
> The new helper replaces the existing swap_cache_alloc_folio. Based on
> this, all the separate swap folio allocation that is being done by anon
> / shmem before is converted to use this helper directly, unifying folio
> allocation for anon, shmem, and readahead.
>
> This slightly consolidates how allocation is synchronized, making it
> more stable and less prone to errors. The slot-count and cache-conflict
> check is now always performed with the cluster lock held before
> allocation, and repeated under the same lock right before cache
> insertion. This double check produces a stable result compared to the
> previous anon and shmem mTHP allocation implementation, avoids the
> false-negative conflict checks that the lockless path can return — large
> allocations no longer have to be unwound because the range turned out to
> be occupied — and aborts early for already-freed slots, which helps
> ordinary swapin and especially readahead, with only a marginal increase
> in cluster-lock contention (the lock is very lightly contended and stays
> local in the first place). Hence, callers of swap_cache_alloc_folio() no
> longer need to check the swap slot count or swap cache status
> themselves.
>
> And now whoever first successfully allocates a folio in the swap cache
> will be the one who charges it and performs the swap-in. The race window
> of swapping is also reduced since the loop is much more compact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Overall looks good. There seems to be some typo on the expression of
orders below.

> ---
> mm/swap.h | 3 +-
> mm/swap_state.c | 222 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> mm/zswap.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
> index ad8b17a93758..6774af10a943 100644
> --- a/mm/swap.h
> +++ b/mm/swap.h
> @@ -280,7 +280,8 @@ bool swap_cache_has_folio(swp_entry_t entry);
> struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry);
> void *swap_cache_get_shadow(swp_entry_t entry);
> void swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio);
> -struct folio *swap_cache_alloc_folio(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_flags,
> +struct folio *swap_cache_alloc_folio(swp_entry_t target_entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> + unsigned long orders, struct vm_fault *vmf,
> struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx);
> /* Below helpers require the caller to lock and pass in the swap cluster. */
> void __swap_cache_add_folio(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
> diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
> index 3da285a891b2..f5c77f348bbd 100644
> --- a/mm/swap_state.c
> +++ b/mm/swap_state.c
> @@ -139,10 +139,10 @@ void *swap_cache_get_shadow(swp_entry_t entry)
>
> /**
> * __swap_cache_add_check - Check if a range is suitable for adding a folio.
> - * @ci: The locked swap cluster.
> - * @ci_off: Range start offset.
> - * @nr: Number of slots to check.
> - * @shadow: Returns the shadow value if one exists in the range.
> + * @ci: The locked swap cluster
> + * @targ_entry: The target swap entry to check, will be rounded down by @nr
> + * @nr: Number of slots to check, must be a power of 2
> + * @shadowp: Returns the shadow value if one exists in the range.
> *
> * Check if all slots covered by given range have a swap count >= 1.
> * Retrieves the shadow if there is one.
> @@ -150,22 +150,38 @@ void *swap_cache_get_shadow(swp_entry_t entry)
> * Context: Caller must lock the cluster.
> */
> static int __swap_cache_add_check(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
> - unsigned int ci_off, unsigned int nr,
> - void **shadow)
> + swp_entry_t targ_entry,
> + unsigned long nr, void **shadowp)
> {
> - unsigned int ci_end = ci_off + nr;
> + unsigned int ci_off, ci_end;
> unsigned long old_tb;
>
> + /*
> + * If the target slot is not swapped out, return
> + * -EEXIST or -ENOENT. If the batch is not suitable, could be a
> + * race with concurrent free or cache add, return -EBUSY.
> + */
> if (unlikely(!ci->table))
> return -ENOENT;
> + ci_off = swp_cluster_offset(targ_entry);
> + old_tb = __swap_table_get(ci, ci_off);
> + if (swp_tb_is_folio(old_tb))
> + return -EEXIST;
> + if (!__swp_tb_get_count(old_tb))
> + return -ENOENT;
> + if (swp_tb_is_shadow(old_tb) && shadowp)
> + *shadowp = swp_tb_to_shadow(old_tb);
> +
> + if (nr == 1)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ci_off = round_down(ci_off, nr);
> + ci_end = ci_off + nr;
> do {
> old_tb = __swap_table_get(ci, ci_off);
> - if (unlikely(swp_tb_is_folio(old_tb)))
> - return -EEXIST;
> - if (unlikely(!__swp_tb_get_count(old_tb)))
> - return -ENOENT;
> - if (swp_tb_is_shadow(old_tb))
> - *shadow = swp_tb_to_shadow(old_tb);
> + if (unlikely(swp_tb_is_folio(old_tb) ||
> + !__swp_tb_get_count(old_tb)))
> + return -EBUSY;
> } while (++ci_off < ci_end);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -244,7 +260,7 @@ static int swap_cache_add_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry,
> si = __swap_entry_to_info(entry);
> ci = swap_cluster_lock(si, swp_offset(entry));
> ci_off = swp_cluster_offset(entry);
> - err = __swap_cache_add_check(ci, ci_off, nr_pages, &shadow);
> + err = __swap_cache_add_check(ci, entry, nr_pages, &shadow);
> if (err) {
> swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
> return err;
> @@ -399,6 +415,137 @@ void __swap_cache_replace_folio(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
> }
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Try to allocate a folio of given order in the swap cache.
> + *
> + * This helper resolves the potential races of swap allocation
> + * and prepares a folio to be used for swap IO. May return following
> + * value:
> + *
> + * -ENOMEM / -EBUSY: Order is too large or in conflict with sub slot,
> + * caller should shrink the order and retry
> + * -ENOENT / -EEXIST: Target swap entry is unavailable or cached, the caller
> + * should abort or try to use the cached folio instead
> + */
> +static struct folio *__swap_cache_alloc(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
> + swp_entry_t targ_entry, gfp_t gfp,
> + unsigned int order, struct vm_fault *vmf,
> + struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx)
> +{
> + int err;
> + swp_entry_t entry;
> + struct folio *folio;
> + void *shadow = NULL;
> + unsigned long address, nr_pages = 1 << order;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf ? vmf->vma : NULL;
> +
> + entry.val = round_down(targ_entry.val, nr_pages);
> +
> + /* Check if the slot and range are available, skip allocation if not */
> + spin_lock(&ci->lock);
> + err = __swap_cache_add_check(ci, targ_entry, nr_pages, NULL);
> + spin_unlock(&ci->lock);
> + if (unlikely(err))
> + return ERR_PTR(err);
> +
> + /*
> + * Limit THP gfp. The limitation is a no-op for typical
> + * GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE but matters for shmem.
> + */
> + if (order)
> + gfp = thp_limit_gfp_mask(vma_thp_gfp_mask(vma), gfp);
> +
> + if (mpol || !vmf) {
> + folio = folio_alloc_mpol(gfp, order, mpol, ilx, numa_node_id());
> + } else {
> + address = round_down(vmf->address, PAGE_SIZE << order);
> + folio = vma_alloc_folio(gfp, order, vmf->vma, address);
> + }
> + if (unlikely(!folio))
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + /* Double check the range is still not in conflict */
> + spin_lock(&ci->lock);
> + err = __swap_cache_add_check(ci, targ_entry, nr_pages, &shadow);
> + if (unlikely(err)) {
> + spin_unlock(&ci->lock);
> + folio_put(folio);
> + return ERR_PTR(err);
> + }
> +
> + __folio_set_locked(folio);
> + __folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
> + __swap_cache_do_add_folio(ci, folio, entry);
> + spin_unlock(&ci->lock);
> +
> + if (mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_folio(folio, vmf ? vmf->vma->vm_mm : NULL,
> + gfp, entry)) {
> + spin_lock(&ci->lock);
> + __swap_cache_do_del_folio(ci, folio, entry, shadow);
> + spin_unlock(&ci->lock);
> + folio_unlock(folio);
> + /* nr_pages refs from swap cache, 1 from allocation */
> + folio_put_refs(folio, nr_pages + 1);
> + count_mthp_stat(order, MTHP_STAT_SWPIN_FALLBACK_CHARGE);
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + }
> +
> + /* For memsw accounting, swap is uncharged when folio is added to swap cache */
> + memcg1_swapin(entry, 1 << order);
> + if (shadow)
> + workingset_refault(folio, shadow);
> +
> + node_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FILE_PAGES, nr_pages);
> + lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_SWAPCACHE, nr_pages);
> +
> + /* Caller will initiate read into locked new_folio */
> + folio_add_lru(folio);
> + return folio;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * swap_cache_alloc_folio - Allocate folio for swapped out slot in swap cache.
> + * @targ_entry: swap entry indicating the target slot
> + * @gfp: memory allocation flags
> + * @orders: allocation orders
> + * @vmf: fault information
> + * @mpol: NUMA memory allocation policy to be applied
> + * @ilx: NUMA interleave index, for use only when MPOL_INTERLEAVE
> + *
> + * Allocate a folio in the swap cache for one swap slot, typically before
> + * doing IO (e.g. swap in or zswap writeback). The swap slot indicated by
> + * @targ_entry must have a non-zero swap count (swapped out).
> + *
> + * Context: Caller must protect the swap device with reference count or locks.
> + * Return: Returns the folio if allocation succeeded and folio is added to
> + * swap cache. Returns error code if allocation failed due to race.
> + */
> +struct folio *swap_cache_alloc_folio(swp_entry_t targ_entry, gfp_t gfp,
> + unsigned long orders, struct vm_fault *vmf,
> + struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx)
> +{
> + int order, err;
> + struct folio *ret;
> + struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
> +
> + /* Always allow order 0 so swap won't fail under pressure. */
> + order = orders ? highest_order(orders |= BIT(0)) : 0;

I can't understand this line. You seem to have put an order variable
assignment in an expression which feels odd to me. I assume you mean
"orders | BIT(0)".

BTW, can you write this as:

order = highest_order(orders | BIT(0));

Because when orders is zero, highest_order(BIT(0)) should be 0 as well.

Chris

> + ci = __swap_entry_to_cluster(targ_entry);
> + for (;;) {
> + ret = __swap_cache_alloc(ci, targ_entry, gfp, order,
> + vmf, mpol, ilx);
> + if (!IS_ERR(ret))
> + break;
> + err = PTR_ERR(ret);
> + if (!order || (err && err != -EBUSY && err != -ENOMEM))
> + break;
> + count_mthp_stat(order, MTHP_STAT_SWPIN_FALLBACK);
> + order = next_order(&orders, order);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * If we are the only user, then try to free up the swap cache.
> *
> @@ -542,51 +689,10 @@ static int __swap_cache_prepare_and_add(swp_entry_t entry,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -/**
> - * swap_cache_alloc_folio - Allocate folio for swapped out slot in swap cache.
> - * @entry: the swapped out swap entry to be binded to the folio.
> - * @gfp_mask: memory allocation flags
> - * @mpol: NUMA memory allocation policy to be applied
> - * @ilx: NUMA interleave index, for use only when MPOL_INTERLEAVE
> - *
> - * Allocate a folio in the swap cache for one swap slot, typically before
> - * doing IO (e.g. swap in or zswap writeback). The swap slot indicated by
> - * @entry must have a non-zero swap count (swapped out).
> - * Currently only supports order 0.
> - *
> - * Context: Caller must protect the swap device with reference count or locks.
> - * Return: Returns the folio if allocation succeeded and folio is added to
> - * swap cache. Returns error code if allocation failed due to race.
> - */
> -struct folio *swap_cache_alloc_folio(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> - struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx)
> -{
> - int ret;
> - struct folio *folio;
> -
> - /* Allocate a new folio to be added into the swap cache. */
> - folio = folio_alloc_mpol(gfp_mask, 0, mpol, ilx, numa_node_id());
> - if (!folio)
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> -
> - /*
> - * Try to add the new folio to the swap cache. It returns
> - * -EEXIST if the entry is already cached.
> - */
> - ret = __swap_cache_prepare_and_add(entry, folio, gfp_mask, false);
> - if (ret) {
> - folio_put(folio);
> - return ERR_PTR(ret);
> - }
> -
> - return folio;
> -}
> -
> static struct folio *swap_cache_read_folio(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp,
> struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx,
> struct swap_iocb **plug, bool readahead)
> {
> - struct swap_info_struct *si = __swap_entry_to_info(entry);
> struct folio *folio;
>
> /* Check the swap cache again for readahead path. */
> @@ -594,16 +700,12 @@ static struct folio *swap_cache_read_folio(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp,
> if (folio)
> return folio;
>
> - /* Skip allocation for unused and bad swap slot for readahead. */
> - if (!swap_entry_swapped(si, entry))
> - return NULL;
> -
> do {
> folio = swap_cache_get_folio(entry);
> if (folio)
> return folio;
>
> - folio = swap_cache_alloc_folio(entry, gfp, mpol, ilx);
> + folio = swap_cache_alloc_folio(entry, gfp, 0, NULL, mpol, ilx);
> } while (IS_ERR(folio) && PTR_ERR(folio) == -EEXIST);
>
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(folio))
> diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
> index e27f6e96f003..4fcd95eb24cb 100644
> --- a/mm/zswap.c
> +++ b/mm/zswap.c
> @@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ static int zswap_writeback_entry(struct zswap_entry *entry,
> return -EEXIST;
>
> mpol = get_task_policy(current);
> - folio = swap_cache_alloc_folio(swpentry, GFP_KERNEL, mpol,
> + folio = swap_cache_alloc_folio(swpentry, GFP_KERNEL, 0, NULL, mpol,
> NO_INTERLEAVE_INDEX);
> put_swap_device(si);
>
>
> --
> 2.53.0
>
>