Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-phyboard-electra-rdk: fix USB clocking for compliance

From: Siddharth Vadapalli

Date: Thu May 07 2026 - 04:55:50 EST


On 07/05/26 13:55, Wadim Egorov wrote:
Hi,

On 5/6/26 5:09 PM, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
According to section "6.5.3 Normative Spread Spectrum Clocking (SSC)" of
the USB 3.2 Specification, SSC should be enabled by default. This protects
against EMI violations. Hence, enable internal SSC for USB SuperSpeed.

Fixes: c48ac0efe6d7 ("arm64: dts: ti: Add support for phyBOARD-Electra-AM642")
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@xxxxxx>
---

v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260505110631.1144200-3-s-vadapalli@xxxxxx/
No changes since v1.

arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-phyboard-electra-rdk.dts | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-phyboard-electra-rdk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-phyboard-electra-rdk.dts
index 793538f94942..a85d7d08bd1b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-phyboard-electra-rdk.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-phyboard-electra-rdk.dts
@@ -439,12 +439,21 @@ &sdhci1 {
status = "okay";
};
+&serdes_wiz0 {
+ ti,core-clk-sel = <1>; /* Select internal reference clock */
+ ti,ssc-enable; /* Enable SSC */
+ ti,ssc-type = <1>; /* 1 for Downspread */
+ ti,ssc-frequency-hz = <33000>; /* 33 KHz */
+ ti,ssc-depth-per-mil = <5>; /* 0.5% depth */

I don't think the comments are very helpful. The property names already give a meaning.

The comments have been added for three reasons:
1. The meaning of the following properties isn't obvious:
ti,core-clk-sel = <1>
ti,ssc-type = <1>
2. For ease of 'grepping'. Grepping for '33 KHz' for example based on the USB 3.2 Specification's modulation rate will not show '33000' in the results.
3. Completeness / Consistency. Since some of the less obvious properties have been described via comments, the remaining have also been commented on, although it is obvious what it means (ti,ssc-enable for example).

Unless you have a strong objection to removing the comments, I would prefer retaining them. Please let me know.

Regards,
Siddharth.