Re: [PATCH ipsec-next v8 04/14] xfrm: fix NAT-related field inheritance in SA migration

[Steffen Klassert]

On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 11:33:09AM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> 2026-05-05, 06:32:43 +0200, Antony Antony wrote:
> > During SA migration via xfrm_state_clone_and_setup(),
> > nat_keepalive_interval was silently dropped and never copied to the new
> > SA. mapping_maxage was unconditionally copied even when migrating to a
> > non-encapsulated SA.
> 
> mapping_maxage should be harmless (0/unused on non-encap), but I think
> migrating nat_keepalive_interval should be considered a fix:
> 
> Fixes: f531d13bdfe3 ("xfrm: support sending NAT keepalives in ESP in UDP states")
> 
> (maybe even split out of this series, but that would cause a conflict
> with the previous patch)

Can this be backported without the previous patches?
If not, we might need to split it out.