Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Documentation: security-bugs: explain what is and is not a security bug

[Linus Torvalds]

On Thu, 7 May 2026 at 00:07, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Perhaps also note that including a reproducer for a crash in public is
> fine, including a full blown exploit is not.
>
> So perhaps that can serve as a guide

That would be a good rule, I think - and I like how it has the
advantage of being very explicit and black-and-white, rather than some
"I think my bug is so important that it should be sent to the speshul
super-sikret list".

Because we all think we are special. Our mothers told us so, and even
the AI bots are typically explicitly told to act as experts. So they
think they are special too.

              Linus