Re: [PATCH v3] iio: accel: adxl355: replace usleep_range() with fsleep()

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Tue, 12 May 2026 10:32:23 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 05:13:31PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 May 2026 10:27:40 +0300
> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
> > > On Sun, May 10, 2026 at 04:38:52PM +0500, Stepan Ionichev wrote:  
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > No functional change.    
> > > 
> > > Strictly speaking the upper limit is not set as 10 milliseconds now,
> > > but defined by the internals of fsleep(), usually +25%.  
> > 
> > I'm not following.  There doesn't seem to be a statement of anything
> > about the upper limit that is used - just one on it not being specified
> > for the part.  
> 
> I meant that switching from usleep_range() with explicit high limit is
> different to implicit fsleep(). And that's a (subtle) functional change.
> Hence "No functional change" is not fully true. Hope now it's clearer.
Ah. Got you.  Thanks for talking me through it!

Jonathan

>