Re: [RESEND PATCH] mm/memory_failure: use bool for hugetlb indicator in try_memory_failure_hugetlb

From: Oscar Salvador

Date: Tue May 12 2026 - 23:45:24 EST


On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 10:48:52AM +0800, Ye Liu wrote:
> From: Ye Liu <liuye@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The hugetlb indicator in try_memory_failure_hugetlb is a Boolean
> flag, but was declared and assigned as int/0/1. Convert to `bool`
> and `true`/`false` for clarity and type safety.
>
> - try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, bool *hugetlb)
> - testcase path in memory_failure(): bool hugetlb = false
> - clear semantic conversion in MF_HUGETLB_NON_HUGEPAGE
> - preserve behavior (no functional change)
>
> Signed-off-by: Ye Liu <liuye@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/memory-failure.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 866c4428ac7e..f164fc5959f0 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -2032,7 +2032,7 @@ int __get_huge_page_for_hwpoison(unsigned long pfn, int flags,
> * -EHWPOISON - folio or exact page already poisoned
> * -EFAULT - kill_accessing_process finds current->mm null
> */
> -static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, int *hugetlb)
> +static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, bool *hugetlb)
> {
> int res, rv;
> struct page *p = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> @@ -2040,12 +2040,12 @@ static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, int *hugetlb
> unsigned long page_flags;
> bool migratable_cleared = false;
>
> - *hugetlb = 1;
> + *hugetlb = true;
> retry:
> res = get_huge_page_for_hwpoison(pfn, flags, &migratable_cleared);
> switch (res) {
> case MF_HUGETLB_NON_HUGEPAGE: /* fallback to normal page handling */
> - *hugetlb = 0;
> + *hugetlb = false;

Do we really need this boolean though?
Why do not simply return ENOENT when we find a non-hugetlb page, and then the caller
knows that if we get ENOENT, it can proceed with normal page handling?

I might be missing something, but is not the following more cleaer?

diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index ee42d4361309..44f388df5731 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -2026,13 +2026,14 @@ int __get_huge_page_for_hwpoison(unsigned long pfn, int flags,
* So some of prechecks for hwpoison (pinning, and testing/setting
* PageHWPoison) should be done in single hugetlb_lock range.
* Returns:
- * 0 - not hugetlb, or recovered
+ * 0 - recovered
+ * -ENOENT - no hugetlb page
* -EBUSY - not recovered
* -EOPNOTSUPP - hwpoison_filter'ed
* -EHWPOISON - folio or exact page already poisoned
* -EFAULT - kill_accessing_process finds current->mm null
*/
-static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, int *hugetlb)
+static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
{
int res, rv;
struct page *p = pfn_to_page(pfn);
@@ -2040,13 +2041,11 @@ static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, int *hugetlb
unsigned long page_flags;
bool migratable_cleared = false;

- *hugetlb = 1;
retry:
res = get_huge_page_for_hwpoison(pfn, flags, &migratable_cleared);
switch (res) {
case MF_HUGETLB_NON_HUGEPAGE: /* fallback to normal page handling */
- *hugetlb = 0;
- return 0;
+ return -ENOENT;
case MF_HUGETLB_RETRY:
if (!(flags & MF_NO_RETRY)) {
flags |= MF_NO_RETRY;
@@ -2107,7 +2106,7 @@ static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, int *hugetlb
}

#else
-static inline int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, int *hugetlb)
+static inline int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
{
return 0;
}
@@ -2386,8 +2385,11 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
}

try_again:
- res = try_memory_failure_hugetlb(pfn, flags, &hugetlb);
- if (hugetlb)
+ res = try_memory_failure_hugetlb(pfn, flags);
+ /*
+ * -ENOENT means the page we found is not hugetlb, so proceed with normal page handling
+ */
+ if (res != -ENOENT)
goto unlock_mutex;

if (TestSetPageHWPoison(p)) {


--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs