Re: [PATCH v5 05/13] dt-bindings: iio: frequency: add ad9910

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Sun, May 17, 2026 at 07:37:49PM +0100, Rodrigo Alencar wrote:
> +maintainers:
> +  - Rodrigo Alencar <rodrigo.alencar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description:
> +  The AD9910 is a 1 GSPS direct digital synthesizer (DDS) with an integrated
> +  14-bit DAC. It features single tone mode with 8 configurable profiles,
> +  a digital ramp generator, RAM control, OSK, and a parallel data port for
> +  high-speed streaming.
> +
> +  https://www.analog.com/en/products/ad9910.html
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: adi,ad9910
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  spi-max-frequency:
> +    maximum: 70000000
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    minItems: 1
> +    items:
> +      - description: Reference clock (REF_CLK).
> +      - description: Optional synchronization clock (SYNC_IN).
> +
> +  clock-names:
> +    oneOf:
> +      - items:
> +          - const: ref_clk
> +      - items:
> +          - const: ref_clk
> +          - const: sync_in

So that's just items with two items and minItems: 1. Like you have in
"clocks:".

You got this comment already at v2.


> +
> +  '#clock-cells':
> +    const: 1
> +
> +  clock-output-names:
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 3
> +    items:
> +      enum: [ sync_clk, pdclk, sync_out ]

Why are the names fixed? And why is the order random?

> +
> +  interrupts:
> +    minItems: 1
> +    items:
> +      - description:
> +          Signal that indicates that Digital Ramp Generator has reached a limit.
> +      - description:
> +          Signal that indicates the end of a RAM Sweep.
> +
> +  interrupt-names:
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 2
> +    items:
> +      enum: [ drover, ram_swp_ovr ]

Your "interrupts:" do not allow flexibility. Are you sure interrupts are
optional in the hardware?

> +
> +  dvdd-io33-supply:
> +    description: 3.3V Digital I/O supply.
> +
> +  avdd33-supply:
> +    description: 3.3V Analog DAC supply.

Best regards,
Krzysztof