Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the origin tree

From: Andrew Morton

Date: Mon May 18 2026 - 16:00:13 EST


On Mon, 18 May 2026 12:28:08 -0700 Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Thanks for the heads up! The resolution looks correct to me but
> > dc1f85a9637cc does not appear to be in Linus's tree? I would have
> > expected the Kbuild tree to have it if so since it is based on 7.1-rc1.
> >
> > $ git describe --contains dc1f85a9637ccd3d171fb5262fd38919dfe632bb
> > Could not get object for dc1f85a9637ccd3d171fb5262fd38919dfe632bb. Skipping.
> >
> > It looks like it is in one of Andrew's trees? I just want to make sure
> > for my notes to Linus.
>
> Hmmm, it looks like Andrew actually dropped this series a few weeks ago,
> as Sasha sent a new version:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/20260427171749.9068CC2BCB4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> https://lore.kernel.org/20260504153401.2416391-3-sashal@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Is this because you used an old version of the mm tree?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/fabba1ab-ceff-429c-af55-92844b179890@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Not that the conflict won't come back with the new version, I just want
> to make sure I have my ducks in a row.

Sasha's kallsyms work is a thing-in-progress. I don't expect to be
re-adding it for 7.1.