sashiko-bot@xxxxxxxxxx's Cc list on reviews

From: Sean Christopherson

Date: Mon May 18 2026 - 17:09:01 EST


Hey Roman!

Sashiko's choice of Cc is... odd. The original mail has a whole pile of folks
in both the To: and Cc:, but sashiko-bot is only replying to myself and (very
bizarrely) linux-hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

Oooh, is it perhaps because linux-hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is the only mailing
list on the original Cc that has opted-in to getting emails? If that's the case,
we might want to change that, even though it could result in people getting grumpy
about unwanted bot mail, because IMO the alternative is worse. I've been responding
to some (mostly very good!) good sashiko-bot feedback, but only just now noticed
that the vast majority of folks on the To/Cc of the original patch won't see the
reviews. That's bound to cause confusion, e.g. if someone reports the same issues
and/or manually looks at sashiko.dev.

----- Forwarded message from sashiko-bot@xxxxxxxxxx -----

Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 19:55:51 +0000
From: sashiko-bot@xxxxxxxxxx
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 36/41] x86/kvmclock: Get local APIC bus frequency from PV CPUID Timing Info

...

----- End forwarded message -----