Re: [PATCH v2] loop: Fix NULL pointer dereference by synchronizing lo_release and loop_queue_rq

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 15 May 2026 10:38:36 +0900 Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The loop driver relies on lo_release() to automatically clear the loop
> device via __loop_clr_fd() when the last file descriptor is closed
> (LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR). Although the backing file structure itself remains
> allocated in memory thanks to proper file reference counting (f_count is
> not zero), a severe race condition exists regarding the visibility of
> the lo->lo_backing_file pointer.
> 
> This race window was exposed by commit 65565ca5f99b ("block: unify
> the synchronous bi_end_io callbacks"). By unifying and optimizing
> the synchronous I/O completion path, the timing and scheduling behavior of
> the block layer altered significantly.
> As a result, a highly-concurrent execution pipeline emerged where
> lo_release() can progress to __loop_clr_fd() and nullify
> lo->lo_backing_file while an already-scheduled asynchronous I/O work
> (lo_rw_aio) is just about to be executed by a kworker thread.
> 
> Since the kworker enters lo_rw_aio() after lo->lo_backing_file has been
> cleared, it attempts to dereference the now-NULL pointer when initializing
> the kiocb, leading to the reported NULL pointer dereference bug.
> 
> To close this race safely without introducing heavy fast-path checks,
> we must ensure that any running or scheduled dispatch threads have
> completed before we nullify the pointer. Since loop_queue_rq() operates
> within the block layer's RCU read-side critical section, invoke
> synchronize_rcu() and drain_workqueue() in __loop_clr_fd() prior to
> clearing lo->lo_backing_file.

AI review asked a couple of questions:
	https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/9b2032d6-3f36-4d2b-8128-985c08a4fa37@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx