Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add Shikra RPM Power Domains

From: Rakesh Kota

Date: Tue May 19 2026 - 02:30:56 EST


On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 12:32:37PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 11:23:39AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > On 5/14/26 11:16 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 02:15:12PM +0530, Rakesh Kota wrote:
> > >> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 02:16:07PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > >>> On 4/29/26 4:09 PM, Rakesh Kota wrote:
> > >>>> Add RPM Power Domains support for the Shikra platform.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Kota <rakesh.kota@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>> ---
> > >>>> drivers/pmdomain/qcom/rpmpd.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > >>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/pmdomain/qcom/rpmpd.c
> > >>>> index 15a11ff282c3f86b1e86c6604d165e297620f6cf..6f751ee5a7833912d54d2bcfd5d85837ab7a97d3 100644
> > >>>> --- a/drivers/pmdomain/qcom/rpmpd.c
> > >>>> +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/qcom/rpmpd.c
> > >>>> @@ -863,6 +863,21 @@ static const struct rpmpd_desc sdm660_desc = {
> > >>>> .max_state = RPM_SMD_LEVEL_TURBO,
> > >>>> };
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +static struct rpmpd *shikra_rpmpds[] = {
> > >>>> + [RPMPD_VDDCX] = &cx_rwcx0_lvl,
> > >>>> + [RPMPD_VDDCX_AO] = &cx_rwcx0_lvl_ao,
> > >>>> + [RPMPD_VDDCX_VFL] = &cx_rwcx0_vfl,
> > >>>> + [RPMPD_VDDMX] = &mx_rwmx0_lvl,
> > >>>> + [RPMPD_VDDMX_AO] = &mx_rwmx0_lvl_ao,
> > >>>> + [RPMPD_VDDMX_VFL] = &mx_rwmx0_vfl,
> > >>>> +};
> > >>>
> > >>> This is identical to sm6125_rpmpds. If you're sure the list is correct
> > >>> and complete (no LPI domains etc.), you can drop this patch, and proceed
> > >>> with just this change:
> > >>>
> > >> There is one difference — the max_state for Shikra is
> > >> RPM_SMD_LEVEL_TURBO_NO_CPR, whereas sm6125 uses RPM_SMD_LEVEL_BINNING.
> > >
> > > It's handled in the DT. As such, programming model and the domain list
> > > looks the same and compatible.
> >
> > Yes/no, this is an upper bound
> >
> > one improvement we could still make to this patch is not to define
> > shikra_rpmpds[], but refer to the existing sm6125 one
>
> SGTM
>
posted the V2 as per suggestion.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260514-add_rpmpd_shikra-v2-2-20bbd37592b0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

regards
Rakesh
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry