Re: [PATCH 02/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for SPR
From: Chen, Zide
Date: Tue May 19 2026 - 18:28:36 EST
On 5/15/2026 11:11 PM, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> Update perf hard-coded event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for
> Sapphire rapids according to the latest SPR perfmon events (v1.39).
>
> Emerald Rapids (EMR) and Granite Rapids (GNR) share exactly same event
> constraints and extra MSR values with SPR. No extra changes are needed
> for EMR and GNR.
>
> Please note the change could temporarily impact other platforms which
> share the hard coded data structures, but it would be fixed in
> subsequent patches soon.
This may make bisection difficult. Would it be possible to reorder the
patches to avoid this? For example, moving patch 6/11 ahead of this
patch to avoid impacting Lunar Lake.
> SPR perfmon events:
> https://github.com/intel/perfmon/blob/main/SPR/events/sapphirerapids_core.json
>
> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index 1390d1da985b..b3ccc785a4f6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -356,11 +356,12 @@ static struct extra_reg intel_glc_extra_regs[] __read_mostly = {
>
> static struct event_constraint intel_glc_event_constraints[] = {
> FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c0, 0), /* INST_RETIRED.ANY */
> - FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0100, 0), /* INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST */
> + FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0100, 0), /* pseudo INST_RETIRED.ANY */
> FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x003c, 1), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.CORE */
> - FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0300, 2), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF */
> + FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0200, 1), /* pseudo CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD */
> + FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0300, 2), /* pseudo CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF_TSC */
> FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x013c, 2), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF_TSC_P */
> - FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0400, 3), /* SLOTS */
> + FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0400, 3), /* pseudo TOPDOWN.SLOTS */
> METRIC_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(INTEL_TD_METRIC_RETIRING, 0),
> METRIC_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(INTEL_TD_METRIC_BAD_SPEC, 1),
> METRIC_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(INTEL_TD_METRIC_FE_BOUND, 2),
> @@ -380,9 +381,13 @@ static struct event_constraint intel_glc_event_constraints[] = {
>
> INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x01a3, 0xf),
> INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x02a3, 0xf),
> + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x05a3, 0xf),
> + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x06a3, 0xf),
> INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x08a3, 0xf),
> + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0ca3, 0xf),
> INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x04a4, 0x1),
> INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x08a4, 0x1),
> + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x01cd, 0xfe),
> INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x02cd, 0x1),
> INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xce, 0x1),
> INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT_RANGE(0xd0, 0xdf, 0xf),
> @@ -714,18 +719,18 @@ static __initconst const u64 glc_hw_cache_extra_regs
> {
> [ C(LL ) ] = {
> [ C(OP_READ) ] = {
> - [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x10001,
> - [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x3fbfc00001,
> + [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x10001, /* OCR.DEMAND_DATA_RD.ANY_RESPONSE */
> + [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x3fbfc00001, /* OCR.DEMAND_DATA_RD.L3_MISS */
> },
> [ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
> - [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x3f3ffc0002,
> - [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x3f3fc00002,
> + [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x3f3ffc0002, /* OCR.DEMAND_RFO.ANY_RESPONSE */
> + [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x3f3fc00002, /* OCR.DEMAND_RFO.L3_MISS */
> },
> },
> [ C(NODE) ] = {
> [ C(OP_READ) ] = {
> - [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x10c000001,
> - [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x3fb3000001,
> + [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x104000001, /* OCR.DEMAND_DATA_RD.LOCAL_DRAM */
> + [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x730000001, /* OCR.DEMAND_DATA_RD.REMOTE_DRAM */
> },
> },
> };