Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] regulator: dt-bindings: Add Unisoc SC2730 PMIC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 06:28:24PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 02:06:11PM +0200, Otto Pflüger wrote:
> > Add bindings for the regulators found in the Spreadtrum/Unisoc SC2730
> > PMIC, used e.g. with the UMS512 and UMS9230 SoCs.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Otto Pflüger <otto.pflueger@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/regulator/sprd,sc2730-regulator.yaml  | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/sprd,sc2730-regulator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/sprd,sc2730-regulator.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..5b91c7b7f3ee
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/sprd,sc2730-regulator.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/regulator/sprd,sc2730-regulator.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Unisoc SC2730 Power Management IC regulators
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Otto Pflüger <otto.pflueger@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> How is this binding meant to apply without a compatible?
> pw-bot: changes-requested

Through $ref on parent device binding. This as well could have been
folded into the parent, but we do have cases like here.

Best regards,
Krzysztof