Re: [PATCH v4] wifi: mac80211: fix monitor mode frame capture for real chanctx drivers

[Óscar Alfonso Díaz]

Ok, I'll do the testing using this one you suggested:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20260519235713.49109-2-lucid_duck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Thanks.
--
Oscar

OpenPGP Key: DA9C60E9 ||
https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x79B17260DA9C60E9
4F74 B302 354D 817D DE38 0A43 79B1 7260 DA9C 60E9
--

El mié, 20 may 2026 a las 11:53, Johannes Berg
(<johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>) escribió:
>
> On Wed, 2026-05-20 at 11:51 +0200, Óscar Alfonso Díaz wrote:
> > Ok, let me do one final test using Johannes’ v2 patch. The expected
> > behavior is as follows:
> >
> > 6.18 or lower: no need to test, it will not work. It’s clear now that
> > this does not matter, since the goal is only to fix newer kernel
> > versions.
> >
> > 6.19: some versions of the 6.19 will crash and others will not. The
> > crash was fixed at some point between 6.18.12 and 6.19.12. No need to
> > test.
> >
> > 7.0, or 7.1: the expected result is that there will be no crash, and
> > VIF + deauth will work only on 2.4 GHz. It will not work on 5 GHz
> > (I'll test both, normal DoS and VIF+DoS). There should be no crash,
> > but it will not work.
> >
> > So I'll focus my testing on 7.0 and 7.1 and I'll get back to you with
> > the results. I'll be testing this patch (v2):
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20251216111909.25076-2-johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
>
> Thanks. For testing that one you'd have to revert the other first, I
> think, you could also just test this one:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20260519235713.49109-2-lucid_duck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> But I think they're basically all equivalent.
>
> Since we eventually need a patch to apply w/o reverting, Devin's is
> probably better than my old one.
>
> johannes