Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allow ATS to be always on

From: Nicolin Chen

Date: Wed May 20 2026 - 18:36:28 EST


Hi All,

Sashiko pointed a couple of valid points.

On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 12:46:10PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> @@ -3851,7 +3870,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_blocking_set_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *new_domain,
> * When the last user of the CD table goes away downgrade the STE back
> * to a non-cd_table one, by re-attaching its sid_domain.
> */
> - if (!arm_smmu_ssids_in_use(&master->cd_table)) {
> + if (!master->ats_always_on &&
> + !arm_smmu_ssids_in_use(&master->cd_table)) {
> struct iommu_domain *sid_domain =
> iommu_driver_get_domain_for_dev(master->dev);

Here the detach path doesn't check sid_domain's type, mismatching..

> @@ -3875,6 +3895,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_attach_dev_ste(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> .old_domain = old_domain,
> .ssid = IOMMU_NO_PASID,
> };
> + bool ats_always_on = master->ats_always_on &&
> + s1dss != STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_TERMINATE;
[...]
> - if (arm_smmu_ssids_in_use(&master->cd_table)) {
> + if (ats_always_on || arm_smmu_ssids_in_use(&master->cd_table)) {

.. the attach path where it only applies to IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY.

I am addressing this with:

@ -3870,13 +3870,15 @@ static int arm_smmu_blocking_set_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *new_domain,
* When the last user of the CD table goes away downgrade the STE back
* to a non-cd_table one, by re-attaching its sid_domain.
*/
- if (!master->ats_always_on &&
- !arm_smmu_ssids_in_use(&master->cd_table)) {
+ if (!arm_smmu_ssids_in_use(&master->cd_table)) {
struct iommu_domain *sid_domain =
iommu_driver_get_domain_for_dev(master->dev);
+ bool ats_always_on = master->ats_always_on &&
+ sid_domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLOCKED;
+ bool downgrade = sid_domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY ||
+ sid_domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLOCKED;

- if (sid_domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY ||
- sid_domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLOCKED)
+ if (!ats_always_on && downgrade)
sid_domain->ops->attach_dev(sid_domain, dev,
sid_domain);
}

> +static int arm_smmu_master_prepare_ats(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
> +{
> + bool s1p = master->smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_TRANS_S1;
> + unsigned int stu = __ffs(master->smmu->pgsize_bitmap);
> + struct pci_dev *pdev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!arm_smmu_ats_supported(master))
> + return 0;
> +
> + pdev = to_pci_dev(master->dev);
> +
> + if (!pci_ats_required(pdev))
> + goto out_prepare;
> +
> + /*
> + * S1DSS is required for ATS to be always on for identity domain cases.
> + * However, the S1DSS field is ignored if !IDR0_S1P or !IDR1_SSIDSIZE.
> + */
> + if (!s1p || !master->smmu->ssid_bits) {
> + dev_info_once(master->dev,
> + "SMMU doesn't support ATS to be always on\n");
> + goto out_prepare;
> + }
> +
> + master->ats_always_on = true;
> +
> + ret = arm_smmu_alloc_cd_tables(master);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> +out_prepare:
> + pci_prepare_ats(pdev, stu);
> + return 0;
> +}

Another issue is: arm_smmu_master_prepare_ats() here doesn't guard
against cases when !arm_smmu_ats_supported() && pci_ats_required().

"!s1p || !master->smmu->ssid_bits" also needs to fail the function.

Actually, this function does not return error at all. This reminds
me of the !pci_prepare_ats() issue Pranj is fixing. For this series,
at least we should propagate the pci_prepare_ats() return value to
the caller.

I see this single patch is getting large. Maybe it's a good idea to
split a bit. I will keep the reviewed parts into patches that retain
the given reviewed-by tags.

Thanks
Nicolin