Re: [PATCH v3] mm: do not install PMD mappings when handling a COW fault

From: William Kucharski

Date: Thu May 21 2026 - 02:26:55 EST


Thank you, that's what I was hoping to see.

Reviewed-by: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@xxxxxxxxx>


> On May 20, 2026, at 09:16, yizhang089@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When pinning a page with FOLL_LONGTERM in a CoW VMA and a PMD-aligned
> (2MB on x86) large folio follow_page_mask() failed to obtain a valid
> anonymous page, resulting in an infinite loop issue. The specific
> triggering process is as follows:
>
> 1. User call mmap with a 2MB size in MAP_PRIVATE mode for a file that
> has a 2MB large folio installed in the page cache.
>
> addr = mmap(NULL, 2*1024*1024, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, file_fd, 0);
>
> 2. The kernel driver pass this mapped address to pin_user_pages_fast()
> in FOLL_LONGTERM mode.
>
> pin_user_pages_fast(addr, 512, FOLL_LONGTERM, pages);
>
> -> pin_user_pages_fast()
> | gup_fast_fallback()
> | __gup_longterm_locked()
> | __get_user_pages_locked()
> | __get_user_pages()
> | follow_page_mask()
> | follow_p4d_mask()
> | follow_pud_mask()
> | follow_pmd_mask() //pmd_leaf(pmdval) is true because the
> | //huge PMD is installed. This is normal
> | //in the first round, but it shouldn't
> | //happen in the second round.
> | follow_huge_pmd() //require an anonymous page
> | return -EMLINK;
> | faultin_page()
> | handle_mm_fault()
> | wp_huge_pmd() //remove PMD and fall back to PTE
> | handle_pte_fault()
> | do_pte_missing()
> | do_fault()
> | do_read_fault() //FAULT_FLAG_WRITE is not set
> | finish_fault()
> | do_set_pmd() //install a huge PMD again, this is wrong!!!
> | do_wp_page() //create private anonymous pages
> <- goto retry;
>
> Due to an incorrectly large PMD set in do_read_fault(),
> follow_pmd_mask() always returns -EMLINK, causing an infinite loop.
>
> David pointed out that we can preallocate a page table and remap the PMD
> to be mapped by a PTE table in wp_huge_pmd() in the future. But now we
> can avoid this issue by not installing PMD mappings when handling a COW
> and unshare fault in do_set_pmd().
>
> Fixes: a7f226604170 ("mm/gup: trigger FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE when R/O-pinning a possibly shared anonymous page")
> Reported-by: Karol Wachowski <karol.wachowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/844e5cd4-462e-4b88-b3b5-816465a3b7e3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2->v3:
> - Update comments to clarify why we shouldn't install PMD mappings
> while doing CoW.
>
> mm/memory.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index ea6568571131..b1aed4f08224 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -5520,6 +5520,17 @@ vm_fault_t do_set_pmd(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct folio *folio, struct page *pa
> if (!thp_vma_suitable_order(vma, haddr, PMD_ORDER))
> return ret;
>
> + /*
> + * We're about to trigger a write or unshare fault on a CoW
> + * mapping, breaking the shared folio into private anonymous
> + * copies at PTE granularity. A PMD mapping would bind an
> + * entire PMD-sized range to the shared folio, defeating CoW.
> + * Fall back to direct PTE mapping.
> + */
> + if (is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags) &&
> + (vmf->flags & (FAULT_FLAG_WRITE | FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE)))
> + return ret;
> +
> if (!is_pmd_order(folio_order(folio)))
> return ret;
> page = &folio->page;
> --
> 2.52.0
>