Re: [PATCH v2] perf/arm-cmn: Add workarounds for CMN-S3 on Graviton5
From: Robin Murphy
Date: Thu May 21 2026 - 12:55:42 EST
On 2026-05-04 2:39 pm, Aviv Bakal wrote:
Graviton5 uses a customised CMN-S3 implementation where certain
discovery registers report zeroed fields. Add the following workarounds:
- Introduce a dedicated ACPI HID to identify the Graviton5 CMN variant.
- Derive the DTC domain from the XP node ID, since the unit info
register reports it as zero.
- Set the DTC logical ID from the computed domain ID, since the node
info register's logical ID field is also zeroed.
Signed-off-by: Aviv Bakal <avivb@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2:
- Use computed domain ID (xp->dtc) instead of XP logical ID for DTC
logical ID assignment.
drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
index f5305c8fdca4..8ee3f8638602 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@
#define CMN_CHILD_NODE_ADDR GENMASK(29, 0)
#define CMN_CHILD_NODE_EXTERNAL BIT(31)
-#define CMN_MAX_DIMENSION 12
+/* Some implementations use a mesh larger than the architectural max of 12 */
+#define CMN_MAX_DIMENSION 14
#define CMN_MAX_XPS (CMN_MAX_DIMENSION * CMN_MAX_DIMENSION)
#define CMN_MAX_DTMS (CMN_MAX_XPS + (CMN_MAX_DIMENSION - 1) * 4)
@@ -214,6 +215,8 @@ enum cmn_part {
PART_CMN700 = 0x43c,
PART_CI700 = 0x43a,
PART_CMN_S3 = 0x43e,
+ /* Synthetic part number, overridden to PART_CMN_S3 during discovery */
+ PART_GRAVITON5 = 0xa5,
};
/* CMN-600 r0px shouldn't exist in silicon, thankfully */
@@ -2221,6 +2224,18 @@ static unsigned int arm_cmn_dtc_domain(struct arm_cmn *cmn, void __iomem *xp_reg
return FIELD_GET(CMN_DTM_UNIT_INFO_DTC_DOMAIN, readl_relaxed(xp_region + offset));
}
+static unsigned int arm_cmn_graviton5_dtc_domain(u16 xp_id)
+{
+ unsigned int x = (xp_id >> 7) & 0xf;
+ unsigned int y = (xp_id >> 3) & 0xf;
+
+ /*
+ * The unit info register reads as zero; derive the DTC domain from
+ * the XP's mesh coordinates over the 10x14 mesh.
+ */
+ return (x / 5) + (y / 7) * 2;
+}
+
static void arm_cmn_init_node_info(struct arm_cmn *cmn, u32 offset, struct arm_cmn_node *node)
{
int level;
@@ -2266,6 +2281,7 @@ static int arm_cmn_discover(struct arm_cmn *cmn, unsigned int rgn_offset)
u64 reg;
int i, j;
size_t sz;
+ bool graviton5_workaround = false;
arm_cmn_init_node_info(cmn, rgn_offset, &cfg);
if (cfg.type != CMN_TYPE_CFG)
@@ -2276,6 +2292,13 @@ static int arm_cmn_discover(struct arm_cmn *cmn, unsigned int rgn_offset)
reg = readq_relaxed(cfg_region + CMN_CFGM_PERIPH_ID_01);
part = FIELD_GET(CMN_CFGM_PID0_PART_0, reg);
part |= FIELD_GET(CMN_CFGM_PID1_PART_1, reg) << 8;
+
+ /* Graviton5 has a customised CMN-S3 which needs some fixups */
+ if (cmn->part == PART_GRAVITON5) {
+ cmn->part = PART_CMN_S3;
+ graviton5_workaround = true;
+ }
+
/* 600AE is close enough that it's not really worth more complexity */
if (part == PART_CMN600AE)
part = PART_CMN600;
@@ -2365,6 +2388,8 @@ static int arm_cmn_discover(struct arm_cmn *cmn, unsigned int rgn_offset)
if (cmn->part == PART_CMN600)
xp->dtc = -1;
+ else if (graviton5_workaround)
+ xp->dtc = arm_cmn_graviton5_dtc_domain(xp->id);
else
xp->dtc = arm_cmn_dtc_domain(cmn, xp_region);
@@ -2443,6 +2468,10 @@ static int arm_cmn_discover(struct arm_cmn *cmn, unsigned int rgn_offset)
switch (dn->type) {
case CMN_TYPE_DTC:
+ if (graviton5_workaround) {
+ /* Node info logical ID is zeroed; use the domain ID */
+ dn->logid = xp->dtc;
No, this really should be xp->logid - other than DTC0 whose logical ID is always forced to 0, but if it naturally lines up that way anyway then all the better - since that is consistent with how the tooling generates a regular hardware configuration. The cmn->dtc array ends up sorted by logical ID as that is a guaranteed stable order for all CMN versions (as the domain numbers themselves aren't always known), and it is the interrupt order defined by the firmware bindings which we need to match. If it's not guaranteed that the actual domain numbers are in the same order then we have an existing bug in general (I'll have to check...)
Otherwise, this looks OK to me - in fact surprisingly pleasant and unobtrusive given that it's a pretty horrible hardware issue to work around. I guess we get lucky that it's an easy topology to compute.
Thanks,
Robin.
+ }
cmn->num_dtcs++;
dn++;
break;
@@ -2658,6 +2687,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id arm_cmn_acpi_match[] = {
{ "ARMHC650" },
{ "ARMHC700" },
{ "ARMHC003" },
+ { "AMZN0070", PART_GRAVITON5 },
{}
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, arm_cmn_acpi_match);