Re: [patch V6 05/16] x86/irq: Suppress unlikely interrupt stats by default

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Thu, May 21 2026 at 21:22, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> On 5/18/26 1:31 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>   	for (unsigned int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(irq_stat_info); i++, info++) {
>> -		if (info->skip_vector)
>> +		if (!test_bit(i, irq_stat_count_show))
>>   			continue;
>
> If this is done, then those lines will be absent in /proc/interrupts right?
>
> If there was a tool expecting these entries, it will fail get to see that entry.
> Is that ok?

I checked the obvious tools and they don't care. They have no
expectations of what's there as that varies due to Kconfig settings,
architectures etc.

Thanks,

        tglx