Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] timekeeping: Fix draft tracking precision and add feed-forward discipline via vmclock

Next message: Myeonghun Pak: "[PATCH 0/2] drm/panel: use devm_drm_panel_add() in more drivers"
Previous message: Borislav Petkov: "Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] x86: Fix a F00F bug warning and cleanup surrounding code"
In reply to: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] timekeeping: Fix draft tracking precision and add feed-forward discipline via vmclock"
Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] timekeeping: Fix draft tracking precision and add feed-forward discipline via vmclock"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Thomas Gleixner

Date: Sun May 24 2026 - 12:36:17 EST

On Sun, May 24 2026 at 17:37, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, May 24 2026 at 17:15, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> There is an existing bug in that code for the retry case. Fix below.

There is none. It's just too hot to think straight. The counterval is
updated once per retry ....