Re: [PATCH net] net/sched: act_api: use mutex in tcf_idr_check_alloc

From: Pedro Tammela

Date: Wed May 27 2026 - 13:39:02 EST


On 26/05/2026 19:08, Kyle Zeng wrote:
Currently, the NEWTFILTER path uses RCU to guard action idr accesses while
the DELTFILTER path uses mutex to guard action accesses. This
inconsistency leads to a race condition scenario, which can lead to
erroneous operations on refcount, eventually leading to use-after-free
situation.
In this patch, we revert the introduction of RCU back to mutex in the
NEWFILTER path, which is consistent with the DELFILTER path, avoiding
the race condition.

Fixes: 4b55e86736d5 ("net/sched: act_api: rely on rcu in tcf_idr_check_alloc")
Signed-off-by: Kyle Zeng <kylebot@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
net/sched/act_api.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c
index 332fd9695e54..63841c3e4310 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_api.c
@@ -874,36 +874,34 @@ int tcf_idr_check_alloc(struct tc_action_net *tn, u32 *index,
u32 max;
if (*index) {
- rcu_read_lock();
+ mutex_lock(&idrinfo->lock);
p = idr_find(&idrinfo->action_idr, *index);
if (IS_ERR(p)) {
/* This means that another process allocated
* index but did not assign the pointer yet.
*/
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&idrinfo->lock);
return -EAGAIN;
}
if (!p) {
/* Empty slot, try to allocate it */
max = *index;
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&idrinfo->lock);
goto new;
}
if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&p->tcfa_refcnt)) {
/* Action was deleted in parallel */
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&idrinfo->lock);
return -EAGAIN;
}
if (bind)
atomic_inc(&p->tcfa_bindcnt);
*a = p;
-
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
+ mutex_unlock(&idrinfo->lock);
return 1;
} else {
/* Find a slot */