Re: [PATCH] docs: mm: clarify that user_reserve_kbytes has no effect when overcommit_memory is set to 0 or 1

[Brian Masney]

On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 09:45:10AM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> Looking at __vm_enough_memory() in mm/util.c, user_reserve_kbytes has no
> effect when overcommit_memory is set to 0 or 1. The documentation for
> overcommit_memory already references user_reserve_kbytes when the flag
> is set to 2.
> 
> Let's go ahead and add a clarification to user_reserve_kbytes in vm.rst
> that it has no effect when overcommit_memory is set to 0 or 1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst
> index 97e12359775c..b9b0c218bfb4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst
> @@ -1034,6 +1034,8 @@ min(3% of current process size, user_reserve_kbytes) of free memory.
>  This is intended to prevent a user from starting a single memory hogging
>  process, such that they cannot recover (kill the hog).
>  
> +This setting has no effect when overcommit_memory is set to 0 or 1.
> +
>  user_reserve_kbytes defaults to min(3% of the current process size, 128MB).
>  
>  If this is reduced to zero, then the user will be allowed to allocate
> 
> ---
> base-commit: e7d700e14934e68f86338c5610cf2ae76798b663
> change-id: 20260528-mm-clarify-docs-76ab8f82826d

+ Other MM maintainers / reviewers. Sorry for not including on the
initial patch posting. I initially missed the separate MM Core subsystem
in the MAINTAINERS file.

Brian