Re: [PATCH 4/8] arm64: dts: qcom: shikra: Add CAMSS node

[bod]

On 2026-05-26 22:42 +0530, Nihal Kumar Gupta wrote:
> Add node for the Shikra camera subsystem.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Vikram Sharma <vikram.sharma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vikram Sharma <vikram.sharma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Nihal Kumar Gupta <nihal.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/shikra.dtsi | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 99 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/shikra.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/shikra.dtsi
> index a4334d99c1f35ee851ca8266ec37d4a200a07ee5..6c47cf2a7ef26b4bb7d7f642a240b435cf5208d8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/shikra.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/shikra.dtsi
> @@ -604,6 +604,105 @@ opp-384000000 {
>  			};
>  		};
>  
> +		camss: camss@5c11000 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,shikra-camss";
> +
> +			reg = <0x0 0x05c11000 0x0 0x1000>,
> +			      <0x0 0x05c6e000 0x0 0x1000>,
> +			      <0x0 0x05c75000 0x0 0x1000>,
> +			      <0x0 0x05c52000 0x0 0x1000>,
> +			      <0x0 0x05c53000 0x0 0x1000>,
> +			      <0x0 0x05c66000 0x0 0x400>,
> +			      <0x0 0x05c68000 0x0 0x400>,
> +			      <0x0 0x05c6f000 0x0 0x4000>,
> +			      <0x0 0x05c76000 0x0 0x4000>;
> +			reg-names = "top",
> +				    "csid0",
> +				    "csid1",
> +				    "csiphy0",
> +				    "csiphy1",
> +				    "csitpg0",
> +				    "csitpg1",
> +				    "vfe0",
> +				    "vfe1";
> +
> +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_CAMERA_AHB_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_CAMSS_AXI_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_CAMSS_NRT_AXI_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_CAMSS_RT_AXI_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_CAMSS_TFE_0_CSID_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_CAMSS_TFE_1_CSID_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_CAMSS_CPHY_0_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_CAMSS_CSI0PHYTIMER_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_CAMSS_CPHY_1_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_CAMSS_CSI1PHYTIMER_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_CAMSS_TOP_AHB_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_CAMSS_TFE_0_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_CAMSS_TFE_0_CPHY_RX_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_CAMSS_TFE_1_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_CAMSS_TFE_1_CPHY_RX_CLK>;
> +			clock-names = "ahb",
> +				      "axi",
> +				      "camnoc_nrt_axi",
> +				      "camnoc_rt_axi",
> +				      "csi0",
> +				      "csi1",
> +				      "csiphy0",
> +				      "csiphy0_timer",
> +				      "csiphy1",
> +				      "csiphy1_timer",
> +				      "top_ahb",
> +				      "vfe0",
> +				      "vfe0_cphy_rx",
> +				      "vfe1",
> +				      "vfe1_cphy_rx";
> +
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 210 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING 0>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 212 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING 0>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 72 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING 0>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 73 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING 0>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 309 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING 0>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 310 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING 0>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 211 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING 0>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 213 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING 0>;
> +			interrupt-names = "csid0",
> +					  "csid1",
> +					  "csiphy0",
> +					  "csiphy1",
> +					  "csitpg0",
> +					  "csitpg1",
> +					  "vfe0",
> +					  "vfe1";
> +
> +			interconnects = <&mem_noc MASTER_AMPSS_M0 RPM_ACTIVE_TAG
> +					 &config_noc SLAVE_CAMERA_CFG RPM_ACTIVE_TAG>,
> +					<&mmrt_virt MASTER_CAMNOC_HF RPM_ALWAYS_TAG
> +					 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI_CH0 RPM_ALWAYS_TAG>,
> +					<&mmnrt_virt MASTER_CAMNOC_SF RPM_ALWAYS_TAG
> +					 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI_CH0 RPM_ALWAYS_TAG>;
> +			interconnect-names = "ahb",
> +					     "hf_mnoc",
> +					     "sf_mnoc";
> +
> +			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x400 0x0>;

So I'm suspicious of this IOMMU.

We should list the full range of IFE SIDs here not a subset. Since we are
register compatible with Agatti that implies to me we should also be IOMMU
compatible.

Please list in your next submission commit log the IOMMU SIDs - comment in
the DTS is fine too.

Ideally list the IOMMus for Agatti/2290 and then explain why the singleton
you have enumerated here is the only required one.

Right now my suspicion radar is high that either the Agatti binding is
wrong or the Shikra binding is.

Possibly both.

---
bod