Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] mm: use mapping_max_folio_order() for force_thp_readahead order
From: Usama Arif
Date: Fri May 29 2026 - 08:36:45 EST
On 28/05/2026 17:55, Usama Arif wrote:
> The force_thp_readahead path in do_sync_mmap_readahead() is gated on
> HPAGE_PMD_ORDER <= MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER and always requests
> HPAGE_PMD_ORDER / HPAGE_PMD_NR. On configurations where HPAGE_PMD_ORDER
> exceeds MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER, notably arm64 with a 64K base page size,
> VM_HUGEPAGE mappings cannot use this path and fall back to the non-forced
> mmap readahead path even when the mapping supports useful large folios.
>
> Keep the existing PMD-sized behavior when HPAGE_PMD_ORDER fits in the
> page cache. When it does not, enable forced readahead for mappings that
> support large folios and request an order capped by both
> mapping_max_folio_order(mapping) and 2MB.
>
> 2MB is chosen as the cap because it matches the PMD size on x86_64
> and on arm64 with 4K or 16K base pages, so the size/memory-pressure
> tradeoff for folios of that size is already well understood. On arm64
> with a 64K base page size, 2MB is also the contiguous-PTE (contpte)
> block size, so the resulting folios coalesce into a single TLB entry
> and reduce TLB pressure on the readahead path.
>
> The final allocation order may still be clamped by page_cache_ra_order()
> to the mapping and request geometry, but this gives VM_HUGEPAGE mappings
> on such configurations a large-folio readahead request instead of
> dropping back to base-page readahead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/filemap.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index a16b33e0fc71..bfb891d9da1f 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -3312,14 +3312,23 @@ static struct file *do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> struct file *fpin = NULL;
> vm_flags_t vm_flags = vmf->vma->vm_flags;
> bool force_thp_readahead = false;
> + unsigned int thp_order = 0;
> unsigned short mmap_miss;
>
> ractl._max_index = vmf->vma->vm_pgoff + vma_pages(vmf->vma) - 1;
>
> /* Use the readahead code, even if readahead is disabled */
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) &&
> - (vm_flags & VM_HUGEPAGE) && HPAGE_PMD_ORDER <= MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER)
> - force_thp_readahead = true;
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && (vm_flags & VM_HUGEPAGE)) {
> + if (HPAGE_PMD_ORDER <= MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER) {
> + force_thp_readahead = true;
> + thp_order = HPAGE_PMD_ORDER;
> + } else if (mapping_large_folio_support(mapping)) {
> + force_thp_readahead = true;
> + thp_order = min_t(unsigned int,
> + mapping_max_folio_order(mapping),
> + get_order(SZ_2M));
> + }
> + }
>
I think might be good to include the below comment to explain the decision being made
here: