Re: [PATCH 03/10] nfsd: serialize nfsd4_end_grace() with atomic test-and-set
From: Jeff Layton
Date: Fri May 29 2026 - 13:18:36 EST
On Fri, 2026-05-29 at 12:05 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On 5/29/26 11:57 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Fri, 2026-05-29 at 11:38 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 28, 2026, at 5:55 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > From: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > nfsd4_end_grace() guards its drain path with a plain bool:
> > > >
> > > > if (nn->grace_ended)
> > > > return;
> > > > nn->grace_ended = true;
> > > >
> > > > The read and the write are independent, and nothing in struct
> > > > nfsd_net serializes them. At least two contexts can reach this
> > > > code with no lock held:
> > > >
> > > > laundromat path
> > > > laundry_wq kworker
> > > > nfs4_laundromat()
> > > > nfsd4_end_grace()
> > > >
> > > > RECLAIM_COMPLETE path
> > > > nfsd compound kthread
> > > > nfsd4_reclaim_complete()
> > > > inc_reclaim_complete()
> > > > nfsd4_end_grace()
> > > >
> > > > Both callers can observe grace_ended == false on different CPUs,
> > > > both store true, and both proceed into nfsd4_record_grace_done(),
> > > > which invokes the active client_tracking_ops->grace_done callback.
> > > > For tracking ops that drain reclaim_str_hashtbl (legacy_tracking_ops
> > > > via nfsd4_recdir_purge_old, and the cld v1+ ops via
> > > > nfsd4_cld_grace_done), grace_done calls nfs4_release_reclaim(),
> > > > which walks every bucket of reclaim_str_hashtbl with no lock and
> > > > calls nfs4_remove_reclaim_record() (list_del + kfree) on each
> > > > entry. Two concurrent walkers corrupt the list and double-free
> > > > every nfs4_client_reclaim. A concurrent nfsd4_find_reclaim_client()
> > > > iterating the same bucket reads through freed memory.
> > > >
> > > > A third call site exists in nfs4_state_start_net() on the
> > > > skip_grace startup path, but it runs under nfsd_mutex before any
> > > > client has connected and before the laundromat's first delayed
> > > > work fires, so it cannot race with the two callers above.
> > > >
> > > > Fix by replacing the read/write pair with try_cmpxchg() so exactly
> > > > one caller transitions grace_ended from false to true and proceeds
> > > > into the drain; the loser returns immediately. bool supports
> > > > 1-byte cmpxchg on all supported architectures, and no lock
> > > > ordering changes are needed.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 362063a595be ("nfsd: keep a tally of RECLAIM_COMPLETE operations
> > > > when using nfsdcld")
> > > > Assisted-by: kres:claude-opus-4-7
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> > > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > > > index f4d12dbcf97b..dc4ac541436f 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > > > @@ -7022,12 +7022,23 @@ nfsd4_renew(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct
> > > > nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> > > > static void
> > > > nfsd4_end_grace(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> > > > {
> > > > - /* do nothing if grace period already ended */
> > > > - if (nn->grace_ended)
> > > > + bool expected = false;
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * nfsd4_end_grace() can be entered concurrently from the
> > > > + * laundromat workqueue and from an nfsd compound thread
> > > > + * handling RECLAIM_COMPLETE. Without serialization, both
> > > > + * callers can observe grace_ended==false and proceed into
> > > > + * nfsd4_record_grace_done(). For tracking ops whose
> > > > + * grace_done drains reclaim_str_hashtbl, that results in
> > > > + * list corruption and a double free of every
> > > > + * nfs4_client_reclaim entry. Use an atomic test-and-set so
> > > > + * exactly one caller proceeds.
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (!try_cmpxchg(&nn->grace_ended, &expected, true))
> > > > return;
> > > >
> > > > trace_nfsd_grace_complete(nn);
> > > > - nn->grace_ended = true;
> > > > /*
> > > > * If the server goes down again right now, an NFSv4
> > > > * client will still be allowed to reclaim after it comes back up,
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.54.0
> > >
> > > Seems like the usual idiom for something like this is an atomic
> > > bit op. Perhaps try_cmpxchg on a boolean variable is not going
> > > to behave as you expect on every hardware platform.
> >
> > We just need a single flag here though. try_cmpxchg() had better work
> > the same way on every platform or a lot of stuff is FUBAR. Where
> > wouldn't it?
>
> Codex suggests on Hexagon, cmpxchg grabs more than just that boolean.
>
Ok, I'm convinced. What I think I'll do is add a new flags unsigned
long to struct nfsd_net and we can convert most of the bools in that
struct to use it instead.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>