Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: validate fast symlink target during inode read
From: Joseph Qi
Date: Sun May 31 2026 - 08:55:05 EST
On 5/28/26 11:12 PM, Zhang Cen wrote:
> ocfs2_validate_inode_block() already rejects several inconsistent
> self-contained dinodes before they are exposed to the rest of the
> filesystem. Fast symlinks need the same treatment.
>
> A zero-cluster symlink is treated as a fast symlink and later read
> through page_get_link() and ocfs2_fast_symlink_read_folio(). That path
> uses strnlen() on the inline payload and then copies len + 1 bytes into
> the folio. If a corrupt dinode stores an i_size that does not fit the
> inline area or omits the terminating NUL at i_size, that copy reads past
> the end of the inode block buffer.
>
> Reject zero-cluster symlink dinodes whose i_size exceeds the inline
> fast-symlink capacity or whose inline payload is not NUL-terminated
> exactly at i_size when the inode block is validated. This keeps
> malformed fast symlinks from reaching the read path.
>
> Validation reproduced this kernel report:
> KASAN use-after-free in ocfs2_fast_symlink_read_folio+0x12c/0x1f0
> RIP: 0033:0x7f5c6d859aa7
> Read of size 3905
> Call trace:
> dump_stack_lvl+0x66/0xa0 (?:?)
> print_report+0xce/0x630 (?:?)
> ocfs2_fast_symlink_read_folio+0x12c/0x1f0 (fs/ocfs2/inode.c:?)
> srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 (?:?)
> __virt_addr_valid+0x19f/0x330 (?:?)
> kasan_report+0xe0/0x110 (?:?)
> kasan_check_range+0x105/0x1b0 (?:?)
> __asan_memcpy+0x23/0x60 (?:?)
> filemap_read_folio+0x27/0xe0 (?:?)
> filemap_read_folio+0x35/0xe0 (?:?)
> do_read_cache_folio+0x138/0x230 (?:?)
> __page_get_link+0x26/0x110 (?:?)
> page_get_link+0x2e/0x70 (?:?)
> vfs_readlink+0x15e/0x250 (?:?)
> touch_atime+0x4d/0x370 (?:?)
> do_readlinkat+0x186/0x200 (?:?)
> do_user_addr_fault+0x65a/0x890 (?:?)
> __x64_sys_readlink+0x46/0x60 (?:?)
> do_syscall_64+0x115/0x6a0 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:87)
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f (?:?)
>
> Fixes: ea022dfb3c2a ("ocfs: simplify symlink handling")
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.5
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Cen <rollkingzzc@xxxxxxxxx>
Looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> index a510a0eb1adc..e54a320f35f1 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> @@ -1525,6 +1525,29 @@ int ocfs2_validate_inode_block(struct super_block *sb,
> }
> }
>
> + if (S_ISLNK(le16_to_cpu(di->i_mode)) &&
> + !le32_to_cpu(di->i_clusters)) {
> + int max_inline = ocfs2_fast_symlink_chars(sb);
> + u64 i_size = le64_to_cpu(di->i_size);
> +
> + if (i_size >= max_inline) {
> + rc = ocfs2_error(sb,
> + "Invalid dinode #%llu: fast symlink i_size %llu exceeds max %d\n",
> + (unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr,
> + (unsigned long long)i_size,
> + max_inline - 1);
> + goto bail;
> + }
> +
> + if (strnlen((char *)di->id2.i_symlink, i_size + 1) != i_size) {
> + rc = ocfs2_error(sb,
> + "Invalid dinode #%llu: fast symlink is not NUL-terminated at i_size %llu\n",
> + (unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr,
> + (unsigned long long)i_size);
> + goto bail;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (le32_to_cpu(di->i_flags) & OCFS2_CHAIN_FL) {
> struct ocfs2_chain_list *cl = &di->id2.i_chain;
> u16 bpc = 1 << (OCFS2_SB(sb)->s_clustersize_bits -
> @@ -1812,4 +1835,3 @@ const struct ocfs2_caching_operations ocfs2_inode_caching_ops = {
> .co_io_lock = ocfs2_inode_cache_io_lock,
> .co_io_unlock = ocfs2_inode_cache_io_unlock,
> };
> -